Perhaps it is because my own personal history weighs
so heavily upon me at times, that I often go to
history to put the present in context.

As we know full well positions change drastically in
an election year. It is never openly stated for
instance "I now believe it is important to turn our
attention to the issue of affordable housing", but
more like our Mayor's statement in The State of the
City speech and in campaign pronouncements, "There is
much more work to do."

The cynic might read that as saying "I know I have not
done a damn thing over the years but now I'm really
ready to tackle this problem now that it seems higher
on people's priority lists and because it's even
showing up in front page articles in the Strib."

I am not mollified by the latest affordable housing
resolution by the city council. At least a year and a
half prior to Friday seven members of the council
gutted a resolution by Niland et al and replaced it
with a much less stringent resolution. Call me cynical
if you will. Hey I don't even trust those who voted
with Niland.

Aside from that, let's look at the city's committment
to housing throughout the past eight years of the
Mayor's reign. Weren't the nineties a period of
incredible wealth creation and culminating in large
government surpluses near the end of the decade. Why
wasn't the city and the Met council even crawling the
halls of the statehouse pressing for tax relief for
builders of multi-unit housing? It seems Republicans
and Dems could have found something to applaud in such
a measure; i.e., Dems the social justice angle and
Reps a tax cut, any tax cut.

Instead in the year 2001 we are using the catch phrase
"crisis in affordable housing". We are way beyond
crisis mode here. We're into catastrophe mode. I was
not among those applauding yesterday at the Council
meeting. I'm sick of hearing people like joan Campbell
talking about how all the other levels of government
have broken down on this issue and must pitch in. Yes
that is true. What is also true is that those levels
of government below have not prodded those above.

Presumably all of us believe in some way by our very
participation in this forum that concerted actions
from below can push the agenda. The city could have
done the same at the legislature and in Washington.
look at the money Martin Sabo has wrung out of
Congress for a dubious measure to address transit
issues in the area. I for one will not be surprised if
no other LRT project   follows on the heels of the
Hiawatha line.

The fact is that Minneapolis and our entire region has
not had very creative leadership for a long time. Look
at how long we dithered over LRT which might have made
greater sense 20 years ago but now is mostly a finger
in the dike. Look at an airport that will consume
billions of dollars over the next decade and then will
only be a short time away from extinction even if it
weren't already by then and which in the meantime had
degraded the quality of life for the greater part of
the city.

Gettin back to Affordable Housing I want to paraphrase
a few comments of Barret Lane. Perhaps Rochelle Olson
has already done this in today's paper. If so I
apologize for being redundant. He voted with everyone
else but he spoke of the social justice side of the
equation that Brian Herron had spoken about. He
pointed out that our city's services were funded by
the most regressive form of taxes; i.e., property
taxes, user fees, and additional sales taxes, and that
there is just so much we can ask our wealthier
citizens to bear especially when basic services such
as snowplowing are not being performed adequately,
bridges are not being rebuilt, etc.

Herron spoke of how we always have found a way to
buyout (some might say bailout) Target Center, find a
way to fund Block E, move The Schubert etc and that we
need to bring that same energy to solving the housing
problems are city faces. 

We've had the means in our grasp and now the means are
less within our reach. It remains to be seen what the
city can do at this point.

I am encouraged that Opus Corp. is starting a new
division that will concentrate solely on building
multi-unit housing. The marketplace may take over and
bail out the politicians who have fiddled around for
years. Proposed property tax incentives in the
legislature will be the starting gun. Lobby your state
reps. You can make a difference. Don't look to the
city except to loosen zoning and building regulations
that  only helped to retard growth in the housing
market.

Sorry for the lecture and its length.

Tim Connolly
Ward 7  

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to