The problem with unscientific polling is that it means absolutely nothing.
This could be construed as a great upswell of discontent or it could be
construed that opposing campaigns got organized to get their folks to call
in to skew the results. Polls that mean something use random sampling for a
reason.
Carol Becker
Longfellow
----- Original Message -----
From: List Manager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mpls list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 8:55 PM
Subject: [Mpls] Channel 9 poll
> Here's the poll on Sharon Sayles Belton's job performance, from KMSP
>
> Quick Poll
>
> How would you rate Mayor Sharon Sayles Belton's job performance?
>
> Excellent = 8%
>
> Good = 31%
>
> Poor = 60%
>
> David Brauer
> List manager, Minneapolis issues
>
> _______________________________________________
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
> Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
> http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>
_______________________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
