Mpls-Issues tip: PLEASE trim the previous message when responding. The redundant characters make tough reading for Digest subscribers and needlessly lengthens download times. ----------- We've hashed out decorum enough for now - I think all of us (whether you agree or not) understand the message. In general, the list is generally not for discussing the list. (Given decaying civility, it was time to - briefly - observe that one in the breach.) Now, I respectfully ask members to stop discussing the "decorum" thread and go back to our purpose - discussing city issues. We are a high-enough traffic list already without excessive navel-gazing. If you still want to talk about the list, please surf to the Minneapolis-Rules discussion on egroups.com http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mpls-rules Unlike the main list, it's usually low-traffic, except when controversy flares. David Brauer List manager, Minneapolis-Issues _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
