Many Crows wrote:
> Do you see the point I'm making, is public vs private. Private life/ public life our
>money/ my money......
> I guess I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt.
1)you would have to get the 1800-3000 homeless children into
a stable
> environment aswell.
Add to Many Crows answer 'all the kids whose home
environment cannot meet the basic needs of children and
adults.'
>2) Neither in grade school or high school did I learn all the really bad things that
> the U.S. government has done to this country's first inhabitants, aswell as to it's
> more left thinking individuals, the rest of the world.... (See A People's History of
> the United States.) So do I feel my education was deficient? A big you
> betcha!!!!!!!!
Me too. The horrible "history" was a disservice to each and
all of the people who make up this country and served well
to keep us from ever getting to the point of embracing the
differences and learning to live as a single group for some
things and as an individual for others.
If we came out of grade and high school without having to
unlearn "information" given to us, we'd be way, way ahead
now.
>3.) Children should be encouraged to teach themselves when their older.
> My peers just avoid it like the plague, that makes it ok.
This is really what makes the cheese more binding, this
sense of walk away from learning, it's not for me. Somehow,
the adult who walks way from learning is the child who was
discouraged from learning and fed misinformation to great a
level.
Yes, yes, yes! Put the great teachers with the little ones.
But don't lay it all on parents, either. Parents don't
necessarily get support for great parenting, nor the tools
to learn great parenting--or even medium to not-so-good
parenting.
WizardMarks, Central
>
> Well, that's my perception from way up here in the branches....
>
> Robert Yorga
> new3
>
> ps: It also makes me cringe when people say "Nordeast".
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I've now read several posts that seem to imply that choice of schools should not
> > be a campaign issue, although others feel it is important. In a very basic
> > sense, this is a personal issue and not a campaign issue. However, I argue that
> > what is an important issue is the dissonance between what Mr. Rybak's campaign
> > says he stands for as compared to his actions.
> >
> > So many public officals are proficient enough at pandering that people have
> > become increasingly sceptical about taking their words at face value. When
> > words demonstrably do not match actions, (regardless of the circumstances and
> > reasoning) it causes people to question the sincerity and committment of the
> > official or candidate under discussion - sometimes even calling their integrity
> > into question.
> >
>
> _______________________________________
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
> Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
> http://e-democracy.org/mpls
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
