Remember: our rules allow pointed disagreement, but require respectful discussion. 
--

At 08:37 PM 9/25/01 -0500, Becker wrote:
>PS I also have an article from "Finance and Commerce" from February this
>year eerily predicting that we would get to this point. 

Curiosity got the better of me.  As near as I can tell, the 
article Carol refers to is "Chairman Mao and the Minneapolis 
City Council."

http://www.finance-commerce.com/recent_articles/010228c.htm

The author is David Jennings, CEO of the Greater Minneapolis 
Chamber of Commerce (fancy that).  He fingers Niland as the 
bad guy.  An excerpt:

   Now, Jim is planning to retire from council duty, but he 
   has one parting gift for his peers: He is organizing a 
   group of candidates to run against those who have failed 
   his tests. He has been seeking out a group of folks who 
   are ideologically pure enough to take up the cause when 
   he leaves. It�s also one last chance to pull the chain of 
   his peers just to watch them squirm.

Of course, it's all the eeevilll Jim Niland's fault that 
incumbents are getting a run for their money this year.  
It couldn't have anything to do with the Green Party or 
the hard work and enthusiasm of people newly interested 
in politics.  And it couldn't possibly have anything to 
do with the obtuse, entrenched incumbents who two or three
years into their terms forgot that an electorate is made
up of individual voters.

Rosalind Nelson
Bancroft--ward 8

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to