The StarTribune once again playing the role of Public Relations Spin with Jim Boyd's article regarding the Target Store.
Why does the StarTribune spend so much of its own revenue advocating subsidizing large downtown development projects for billion dollar corporations?
What is wrong with politicians or the public questioning large subsidies to these billion dollar corporations?
How much print space has been spent on advocating Pro Target Store development over the past 3 years?
Who are the decision makers on the StarTribune editorial board?
Ken Bradley
Corcoran Neighborhood
List Manager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Strib edit writer Jim Boyd criticizes those who claim the Downtown
Target received a $100 million subsidy, and concludes, "It was a good,
reasonable investment."
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/727156.html
David Brauer
List manager
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
Do You Yahoo!?
Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone with Yahoo! by Phone.
