Greg Luce asked: > PS: On one other note, I checked out the Election Toolkit, which is > terrific (with kudos to all who brought it together), but there are some > candidates who are missing. One question: do the candidates submit > their responses to various endorsing procedures or do the various groups > release them to the toolkit? In other words, who is at fault if no > information is posted about a candidate?
The candidate is at fault. The overly committed (in more ways than one) volunteer putting this together needs candidates to voluntarily submit screening questionnaires to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I refuse to beg, though! If you see a questionnaire on the toolkit page, rest assured the candidate or her/his campaign has taken the initiative.... Also, a strong advisory (though not a list rule yet): Members - please try to limit your use of all-caps (LIKE THIS) to a few words per post. Lots of all-caps has long been considered "shouting" in Internet circles (so-called Netiquette) and given that we try to be civil on the list, I try to discourage lots of all-caps. Also, I would strongly suggest all members be sure to paragraph their responses - it is really, really hard to read a steady stream of un-paragraphed sentences...and getting read is why you write this stuff, isn't it? Finally, Robert Lilligren's Sierra questionnaire has been posted to the toolkit page (hey, Sierra Club, look at all the publicity!!): http://www.e-democracy.org/mpls/toolkit.htm http://www.e-democracy.org/mpls/lillisierra.htm Thanks, David Brauer List manager _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
