The Riverview supper club should be neither park land nor housing, but
instead it should be light manufacturing.  Minneapolis has been giving up
industrial land for decades now to other uses and then bemoans the lack of
living wage jobs.  City folk interested in fighting sprawl should understand
that a significant portion of sprawl has occurred over the past 100 years
has been generated by city folk forcing �Dirty� businesses away from
residential areas. Residential area that initially were built to be near the
jobs that were born along the Minneapolis riverfront. Jobs in the form of
unwanted industries were forced out to and beyond the city�s fringes, only
to be followed by workers interested in being close to jobs.

While the total number of jobs has grown in Minneapolis dramatically over
the past decade or two, the types of jobs and the job setting have been
almost exclusively been located in our robust downtown. (A downtown whose
robustness has been stimulated and maintained by far sighted municipal
investments by elected officials who were willing to do what was needed,
despite it not necessarily always bring popular.) But downtown jobs while
diverse and varied do not meet the needs of the entire city's working
population, and the dwindling supply of available industrial property should
be of significant concern to people from throughout the city.  Just because
the Riverview site is not in my back yard, (reverse Nimby�ism) I do feel it
important to stand up and say that it would be more appropriate to expand on
the adjacent industrial base and to retain and expand the riverfront
industrial area.

I believe the city should do an annual assessment of its economic base,
identifying the types of business by industry type and its employment
characteristics.  It should monitor the changes in its economic profile both
in terms of the types of firms and employment to get a better handle on how
that base corresponds with the employment aspirations of its people. I�ve
done similar studies in suburban communities on a one shot basis. If one
were to be done retroactively of Minneapolis, I think my hypothesis that we
have been bleeding good living wage jobs and stimulating suburban sprawl
would hold up.  The Riverview site just happens to be the most recent
example of suitable property being sanitized to the detriment of the city's
workers.

Earl Netwal
5344 36th Ave S.
Mpls., MN 55417

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to