In a message dated 10/30/2001 8:04:44 AM Central Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> It's one thing to list and explain the problems (or symptoms of underlying
>  problems) faced by the students, families, teachers and administrators in
>  our public school system.  It is quite another to identify, promote,
>  implement and test concrete solutions to said problems given the very real
>  limitations faced (i.e. funding, Board agreement and community support,
>  etc.).  I'd like to hear the specific solutions Ms. Eubanks is espousing--
>  and from her, not a spokesperson.
>  
>  Michael Hohmann
>  13th Ward

I am not a spokesperson for Evelyn Eubanks. I have endorsed Evelyn Eubanks, I 
have worked closely with Ms. Eubanks during the past 4 years as a member of 
the NAACP and Parents Union.  I agree with Ms. Eubanks that we need to keep 
the focus on fixing the schools, not on fixing the kids, the parents and 
communities of color.  That's been the theme of the many speeches that I have 
heard Ms. Eubanks deliver. That was the programmatic basis of the Minneapolis 
Parents Union.    

It seems that Mike Hohmann isn't very interested in identifying the problems, 
he wants to hear about the solutions.  However, one cannot identify effective 
solutions to a problem without first accurately identifying the causes of the 
problem.  

Kathy Kosnoff wrote: "IF Doug was the candidate, his entire posting would 
have relevance.  He isn't and Evelen has had little to say in re analysis, 
positions or proposed 
solutions to the many and complex issues faced by the Minneapolis School 
Board... "

How does the fact that my name will not appear on the ballot next Tuesday 
make what I say irrelevant?  

And even if it were true that Evelyn has had little to say about in re 
analysis, positions, or proposed solutions to the many and complex issues 
faced by the Minneapolis Public Schools, so what?  How would that make my 
analysis, positions, and proposed solutions irrelevant? 

"CLOSING THE GAP"

It is quite evident that the Minneapolis Board of Education failed to arrive 
at an accurate diagnosis of the academic achievement gap between black and 
white students before it implemented a plan to close it: the community school 
plan.  

The board has certainly made progress in implementing the community school 
plan, but it hasn't made any progress toward its stated goal of "closing the 
gap."  Ordinarily, one would speak of an organization making "progress" in 
relation to achieving the stated goal of its overall plan of organization, 
which is what the Community School Plan is.  Yet, district officials say they 
have been making "progress" in the face of evidence that the academic 
achievement gap is getting bigger, not smaller.  

Why is the gap getting bigger?  We know that class size and teaching 
experience makes a difference.  On average, the concentration of experienced 
teachers and class sizes have increased at schools serving poor, 
predominantly black neighborhoods since the community school plan was 
implemented.  The reverse has happened in schools that serve the most 
affluent, predominantly white neighborhoods.

Poor neighborhoods usually end up with inferior educational facilities, 
unless kids from poor and non-poor neighborhoods share the same facilities. 
Schools serving students in high poverty neighborhoods need more of the 
resources that make schools good, but usually have to make do with less.  

A plan to desegregate the schools in Minneapolis is desirable because it puts 
some pressure on district officials to equalize educational facilities. As 
others have pointed out, the mayor proposed to desegregate the schools by 
desegregating the neighborhoods, but nothing has happened.  If you are going 
to deconcentrate poverty and desegregate the neighborhoods, you have to 
identify the cause.  It's not rocket science.  Poverty is heavily 
concentrated in certain neighborhoods as a result of illegal discrimination 
in the job and housing markets. The solution is simple: enforce fair 
employment and housing laws.  

Are the school board candidates who regularly participate in this forum going 
to say something about these issues, or just attack Evelyn Eubanks?

-Doug Mann, Kingfield             
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to