The Star Tribune has taken its fair share of abuse in this election season, some of which I've agreed with. But I'm hoping list members can help me understand three things as we get to the end of the campaign:
1) The Star Tribune has been said by some list members to have an agenda of getting Sayles Belton reelected. Why then did it publish a poll today showing Rybak ahead by 20 points? 2) It was said that the Star Tribune's corporate agenda dictated its editorial page endorsements. Why then did it endorse two Green Party candidates? 3) The Star Tribune's polling methods were criticized by some opponents of the mayor after the September mayoral poll. Why have they not voiced the same criticisms now that a poll finds their candidate ahead by 20 points? Steve Brandt _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
