Sorry, Tony, if it wasn't you who said that. I remember it as being you. At any rate, it wasn't meant to diss you, but to show what the consequences of turning over decision making to the neighborhoods would be. In my estimation it was a very accurate assessment--city council did lose some power by turning over decision making and money to the neighborhoods. I don't think there was anything evil about the statement. I do know you were involved in the process and craffting the plan. I also remember it as you asking the question about where the money for the second ten years would come from. The second ten years is upon us, and that question does not seem to be settled. In my estimtion, that makes you right twice. The question then becomes, for some issues, can we project for 20 years or is that too much time? I, too, am a DFLer and not paarticularly sorry about that. My question is more about where is the DFL going and how will we get there. Wizard Marks, Central
> Tony Scallon wrote: > > I do not remember this comment. Possibly you have a > transcript. > > Wizard, I know the new politics theocracy states that > anyone involved in the past was evil. I am not active in > politics now except as a DFL delegate. Unlike the new > politics, I am proud to be a Democrat. > > You forgot who wrote the first plans for the 20 year > plan. I think I was involved. > > I assume the new politics theocracy no longer wants to > hear from any other ideas or experiences. Therefore, the > answer is misquote and diss them. > ----------------------------------------------------- > Click here for Free Video!! > http://www.gohip.com/free_video/ _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
