I saw an article in the current SW Journal.

I apologize for not being able to include one of those
groovy blue lined addresses that all you have to do is
click on and VOILA, you're somewhere else.

The article was about Whittier Alliance wishing to
reallocate $173K from their NRP Phase 1 money,
earmarked for various housing programs, to pay for
staff, ongoing 2002 operating expenses, and NRP Phase
2 Planning.

I do not want to suggest anything untoward about this
action.

I know little of the workings of neighborhood
organizations vis a vis NRP, etc. How they are
separated and all.

The first paragraph of the article reads "The Whittier
Alliance will hold a neighborhood meeting to ask for
community support to reallocate $173K in its
Neighborhood Revitalization Program budget."

It doesn't say if that support means a vote

It also does not mention whether or not the Whittier
Alliance has to run this by NRP and since the City
Council in effect approves each NRP plan, it might not
have to go through the Council.

As I said I do not mean to cast aspersions so much as
look at procedure for such a transaction.

And the idea that the money will come from "various
housing programs in NRP Phase 1" as the article states
does give one pause to be concerned.

I thought that basically everyone in the city was
scratching for bucks, bringing in their penny jars so
that we could build more housing!

I also don't understand staffing with some
neighborhood groups. Why do some have numerous staff
members while others have one or two.

In some cases I can understand.

For instance; in the case of Longfellow Community
Council, four neighborhoods have joined forces in a
natural fit. 

But why would Hawthorne have 7 staff as I count and
Near North have only two and Jordan have only one or
two?

Of course combinations have their drawbacks as we are
seeing with the 40th Street Greenway and this past
summer with the expansion of Minnehaha Academy and the
removal of 18 or 22 old oak trees.

The people closest to the academy felt their votes
might have weighed more than those on the other side
of the community.

It would take someone with Solomonic powers to mediate
these disputes but I think it is necessary.

I always saw that as one of the functions of the Mayor
in our city.

I think it is sorely lacking in our city.

That is one reason I opposed R.T. for Mayor.

His previous "neighborhood experience" it seemed to me
to be solidifying a group of like minded people to
make their voices heard, as in the case of ROAR.

Well I see I've strayed from the path of my main
inquiry and lapsed into streetfighting mode

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to