I have a suggestion for RT and the new council.  City inspections at the
behest of the city attorneys office are pressing the landlords to take over
another responsibility of the city's.  Seems some court ruled that the city
can't take landlords notice as sufficient notice to perform a city mandated
city inspection. This would not be a complaint driven inspection but a
annual license inspection.  The city is fearing a lawsuit.

Now the city wants us to go door to door and secure the signatures for
approval by the tenants.  Here's the problems.

1. It leaves the tenant with the impression that they can turn down any
inspection.  This is bad.  Landlord has the right to inspect as long as
reasonable notice is given.  This has stood con law, case law, statute law
for over 1000 years.

2. This extra expense will have to be paid in more rent increases.

3. This is the city's responsibility.

4. Good landlords will comply.  Bad landlords will only seek signatures from
the units that are ready to be inspected.  Units that are not ready to go
will have to be inspected after an administrative warrant is obtained.  How
much time and money will be spent on this procedure before the city gives up
and only inspects the units that have consented?

5. What about the tenant who wants to say "no" but feels intimidated just by
the landlord's presence?

RT AND DAVID FEY, IF YOUR READING,  KILL THIS EXTRA REGULATION RIGHT NOW.
TELL THE CITY ATTY'S OFFICE TO DO WHAT ST. PAUL DOES.

Craig Miller
Former Fultonite
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----- But it's not the case.
> This afternoon I'm meeting with David Fey and our affordable housing task
> force,  Also wish there
> was 24-7 news coverage and interest in affordable housing, as there is in
> baseball.  Sorry for making excuses but I quite openly acknowledge that
the
> news about

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to