Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 19:36:29 -0600
From: "wizardmarks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Strib edit: build the exta/transit lane on 35W

David Brauer wrote:
>
> One thing I have heard (and would like list comment on) is that the
> "transit lane" pitch of the lane expansion is, in essence, a sham.


Wizard Marks wrote:
IMHO, it's a bait-and-switch routine. We asked for a
remediation of mistakes made in the building of 35W at Lake
Street. Before Freeway (b.f.), both Nicollet Av. and Lake
St. were major commercial arteries. Part of the reason for
decline, if not most of the reason, is attributed to the
lack of access at 35W and Lake.
The remediation we asked for was a Northbound entrance and a
Southbound exit at Lake St., new bicycle/pedestrian bridges
at 40th and 26th Sts., better looking bridge at 31st and
Lake Sts. (under 35W). MNDOT came back with, 'we have to
move the 35th/36th St. exits to 38th St so as not to worsen
a bad design flaw and create more traffic hazards.'
This latest from MNDOT is a whole 'nuther ballgame and a
nose thumbing to us if ever there was one. People have
worked hard on 35W for over two years only to be told it's
all for nought.
Had I sat through those numerous and perhaps endless
meetings, I'd be royally honked off at MNDOT. Not having sat
through that, I'm still royally honked. For everyone's sake,
we have to get trains bringing people from the far burbs or
exurbs and the mid-burbs and the near-burbs.


Jana Metge writes:

With regard to the the above statement, and having sat in on 35W meetings
for 2 years during my 8 years at CNIA, people living around 35th and 36th
street asked for the freeway ramps to be shut down.  There was a survey done
during 1997 through the Weed and Seed initiative and many, many residents
felt that with the new Library expansion, as well as the New School, Early
Learning Center, and Clinic...it was now too dangerous to cross those
streets.

There had been many a time when cars racing to get onto 35W crashed into the
fence and yard on the corner of 35th and 3rd Ave. So.  Of residents in that
area surveyed, at that time, the majority wanted the freeway ramps now
closed on those intersections.  Those survey results were given to the 35W
committee at the beginning of the 35W discussions.

Additionally, at a 35W meeting, where I was present, it was Councilmember
Herron that suggested a ramp at 38th St.  He felt that it would enhance the
commercial potential of that corridor.  He was the one who requested that
staff research this.

Additionally, a community involvement committee was put together.  I served
on it, as did Robert Lilligren, David Sabaka from Whittier, and Sarah
Hernandez from Honeywell..several Community meetings were held at that time.
This would have been in 1999-2000.  Again, residents surveyed and the
majority of those who attended (meetings at Hosmer, as well as at the Zurah
Shrine building) again asked that closing 35th and 36th St. be researched
due to safety reasons.  The fast traffic was hazardous and the environment
had changed due to the school development, as well as the expanded use of
the Hosmer Library.

If now the climate has changed again and residents are not wanting 35th and
36th to be closed, great....but if residents are still worried about the
safety of families going to the clinic and school....we need to ask them and
see if that need is still there.  Is it safe for parents to cross 35th St.
to go to the School, clinic, pre-school?  Is is safe for folks to park their
cars on 36th and get out and go to Hosmer Library.

Jana L. Metge
Phillips Resident
Staff/CLPC
 
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to