I appreciate Earl's comments below - really - and shudder to think that
we have grown so in three years as to now be partially responsible for
the city's budget troubles! I suspect a few of them were around before
Minneapolis-Issues came on the scene, and perhaps newer factors, such as
the governor's dislike of local government aid, might not be a result of
monitoring this list.

I as much as anyone wonder if this thing is a worthwhile time-suck;
however, I find it telling that after Earl's fair point, he comes to the
conclusion that he likes it here.

I suspect that he is speculating about the taxpayer-paid hours spent
monitoring this list. It's true, we are a coffeeklastch of roughly 200
posters (when last I counted) and as of this evening, a grand total of
800 subscribed addresses...right on the dot, this evening, honest! Pop
the champagne corks!

We are not perfectly representative and never claimed to be. I suspect
most intelligent souls on the list - and by that I mean most souls here
- are all too aware of our limitations.

I do need to reassure the public against the charge of dissipating the
public treasury. I have a policy not to divulge specific subscriber
names (members get to "out" themselves by posting), a quick check
reveals 52 subscribed addresses from the city domain
(ci.minneapolis.mn.us). Of those, about 20 are council members and their
staffs - elected officials who are responsible to the voters, so they're
already accountable. Another ten or so are public-information officials.
I'd argue they, more than most, should be monitoring this list...and I'm
grateful they use it more and more to get the word out.

That leaves about 20 city employees out of the city payroll (I'm not
counting the MCDA) who are possibly obsessing where they shouldn't.

However, since I know a few of these hardy souls, I know them to be
hard-working and deeply concerned about the city. For every employee who
is possibly using this to avoid work (hey, why do you think I started
it?), I speculate that many draw some kind of important sustenance from
it....who like that city information - however occasionally infuriating
- has another way of getting to the public, and is reasonably
self-correcting right here on this very forum. They even contribute, or
do so by informing people such as myself.

I don't know if the dragged-down city employee of Earl's speculation is
a myth; I hope the atta-boy city employee is more prevalent, and that we
are a positive and not excessive lightning rod.

Back to the time-suck: I encourage all members - not just the ones
drawing income from my property taxes - to use the delete key
liberally...no need to be an obsessive completist on a list with
democratic access. 

Perhaps there's a happy medium - stay plugged in, but tune out when the
infuriating stuff gets infuriating. If only I could take my own advice!!

Best,
David Brauer
List manager


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Earl
> Netwal
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Mpls] TO RT: Budget saving consideration.
> 
> I think it was wise of the mayor to ask city staff to suggest ways to
reduce
> city expenses. While not specifically asked as a citizen to suggest
ways, I
> humbly suggest the following.  It is my guess that upwards of fifty to
> several hundreds of city staff persons are spending thousands of hours
a
> month monitoring this "chat" line.   While the concept of democratic
access
> is laudable, it has some very real costs.



_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to