|
I
have never been close to 'neighborhood' organizations, I get the
local talk and media reports. The idea of 'neighborhoods' to
facilitate and promote neighborhoods and 'neighborey' activities is
positive and inevitably there are some people involved that are a positive
effect and influence, but overall the whole thing stunk from the
start about 27 years ago.
I
attended a city wide meeting in basement of Government Center about that long
ago at which a few people mainly from West Bank, -Jack Kahn was biggey-
announced and discussed this whole thing of dividing the city into
'neighborhood' areas, each of which would have offices and be staffed and deal
with neighborhood 'issues' of crime and housing etc. All seemingly
positive directions. As history student, I lived in McKnight Tower of West
Bank in 70s and knew most of the activist crowd there.
The West Bank
of the University of Minnesota was -upon 1980 censes, DFL firmly in
controll-redistricted so that 4 City Wards cornered in the West Bank area,
giving maximum political connect. About that time also it
was the start of the Mayoralty of the 'wonderful' Don frazer,
very DFL machine politician. Jack Kahn got some city job when Frazer
became Mayor.
Of course the
'neighborhood' thing worked wonderfully with a monolithic political
machine. campaign helpers, after successful campaigns could be rewarded
with staff jobs in neighborhood offices, and from where they could maintain the
connect with the succussful candidate and organization, -the city funding
the neighborhood offices- and then the neighborhood can do a lot in the
'neighborhood' to build political interests of the machine, the
DFL.
Political
direction was always to the 'left'. The West Bankers, as joined
with the city DFL interests were hard core socialists at heart, and wanting to
implement a more socialist community, promoted public housing, 'non
profit' organizations etc., -which of course have been a locked in campaign
financial support- and expressly sought to make property owners
"extinct".
And if you
are positive on such 'movement', you should watch out for card cheats,
peddlers of the Brooklyn Bridge, and other such con men and their
schemes. There is no such thing -and never was- of a for real
socialist/communist. They want to socialize everyone else. It
would be something to their credit for intent if they fantacized themselves as
some kind of 'Leader' type but mostly they don't.
They want
money.
Even in the Soviet Union,
from earliest times, the neighborhood 'commisars', boss types, who levied and
collected 'neighborhood' taxes, were said to have often spent the
money personally.
The 'neighborhood' groups
and offices have been sink hole for millions of dollars of taxpayer moneys
as through the years 'People of Phillips' and Whittier Alliance, for
example, have gone through series of firings, people running out of
the office, always occasioned with a looting of the funds.
The NRP, again a seeming
positive effort to support the communities/neighborhoods just makes lots of
millions of dollars available for staff types to use in covering up their
dumb mistakes as amateurs dealing in property, to maintain their payroll
packages, or to just take and run, --and with numerous audits
bringing up six figure moneys unaccounted for.
And they have gone tooth
and nail after private property owners to get their properties so as to boost
their housing 'operations' and so as to boost revenues and justify larger
salaries.
I was told once by someone
on the inside (Earl Netwall) that "these new organizations are trouble at
the start but after a few years they smooth out and become a positive
influence.
I will remain uninvolved
with the 'fiefdoms'.
James E
Jacobsen
'Whittier'
|
- Re: [Mpls] fiefdoms James E Jacobsen
- Re: [Mpls] fiefdoms Dan Nordley
- RE: [Mpls] fiefdoms Paul Lohman
- FW: [Mpls] fiefdoms Dan Nordley
- [Mpls] fiefdoms James E Jacobsen
