I am concerned about recent conversations about fiefdoms and neighborhoods. I 
don't think we should be disrespectful of the many good accomplishments of 
neighborhood staff and organizing efforts, or encourage the city to not fund 
these efforts. These efforts to work with our neighbors, play an important 
part in how or city works.
Good neighborhood staff are a great treasure
 I have worked with many from several different communities.

I get strength and inspiration from my neighborhood. I live in Seward which 
has a great wealth of talented and interesting people.  Seward list members 
include: Erik Riese, Sheldon Mains, Jean Johnstad, Cara Letofsky, MJ Mueller, 
Todd Melby, Cam Gordon. Seward is a good place to live, work, and play. I 
regard the term-neighborhood activist-as a positive label.

I think it is really important to have a neighborhood level of democracy. I 
am really proud of  the accomplishments of my neighborhood and how it has 
used NRP and other funding: Fairs, celebrations, art crawls. garden tours, 
environmental activism, Milwaukee Ave. the preservation and neighborhood 
control of hundreds of units of affordable housing in the Seward Towers, 
housing preservation and rehab, the East African River Cruise, investment in 
the park building and facilities, investment in alternative energy, the 
improvement of Franklin Ave. our cooperative efforts with Seward Redesign, 
partners in the River Gorge Stewards, etc., etc.
{I just came from the Seward Winter Ice (rain) Follies}

My point is not to extol the virtues of Seward, but to extol the virtues of 
grass roots democracy and neighborhood levels of organizing in Seward and 
other neighborhoods. Participatory democracy is the antidote to political 
cynicism and apathy. The structure of how decisions are made and increasing 
the number of people who are involved will continue to be great challenges.
The Issues list itself is an electronic neighborhood where the dynamic of 
discussion and interaction does have influence and application to decisions 
that are being made about our city.
There many places where social action and interaction takes place, political 
parties, churches, non profit groups, citizen boards, garden clubs, but there 
is something very important in organizing close to home on neighborhood 
levels. Not to say that there isn't a need to better connect individual 
neighborhood initiatives or that there isn't going to be conflict or 
controversy.
NRP has successes and failures, but has generally been a good mechanism for 
getting the kind of citizen input that makes us a better city. Even in 
difficult times in terms of city financing, there needs to be a funding 
mechanism that enables neighbors to have some staff for neighborhood 
organizing.
Thanks, Scott Vreeland, Seward, Chair of the Seward Neighborhood Group
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to