Speaking again from my recent experience as the seller of a house in
Minneapolis, my
realtor told me that most buyers hire their own inspectors, and the sale
is
contingent upon what their inspector finds.  If there are major problems
the
Purchase Agreement is null and void.  This has been the case with
everyone I know
who has sold recently and was the case with me.  I know of only 1 buyer
who did not
hire an inspector and she was sorry for it afterwards (the house was in
Richfield,
not Mpls., though).  She had her father, a retired contractor, look at
it, and he
didn't check out the roof, which turned out to be shot, also she has got
mice like
crazy (the previous owners had two cats).

I used my own inspector when I bought my current house in Burnsville --
where the
Truth in Housing law is not nearly as burdensome as Minneapolis' is, and
although
nothing major was found I was glad to have the reassurance.  It costs
about $300 for
the average house (fees are based on square footage and type of
dwelling).

When I bought the house in Minneapolis, in 1983, the use of a private
inspector was
almost unheard of.  Now it is common practice and has spawned a whole
new industry.

I think the law has its good points, as I said in my previous response
to Tim.  The
good thing about it is that major hazards must be fixed when the house
changes hands
and this is enforced by city inspection.  It keeps the housing stock
from
deteriorating, as was the case prior to the law.

What's wrong with the law is that it requires numerous "repairs" that
are not safety
related, some of which are merely cosmetic, or "nice to haves" as
opposed to "need
to have".

If the law could be modified to apply to only major safety hazards I
think it would
do its job and not be so burdensome.

Barbara L. Nelson
Burnsville, formerly Seward for 18 years
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to