Pamela Taylor wrote:

> You raise some good points.  However, one thing I
> would like people to consider as well is that ALL kids
> are gifted.  If the system sought to develop ways to
> ACTIVELY reach more kids, there could be less emphasis
> put on finding resources for the so called "typical"
> gifted students.

All children are not gifted. Treating every child as gifted
insures uniform mediocrity in instructional methods.

> Again, IMHO, we keep classifying the out-dated as
> standard norms of giftedness.  This rules a lot of
> students whose giftedness has yet to be unearthed OUT,
> and tosses them right back INTO the standard
> oppressive molds, and then we wonder why we have a
> major problem in education.

Children have different talents and abilities.  The school
system should provide opportunities for each child to maximize
their potential, but classifying everyone as gifted, in the
sense of general intelligence, prevents truly gifted children
from receiving proper instruction.

> We need to stop trying to protect the standards that
> continually oppress our children, and seek to
> establish new ones.  We need to utilize what funding
> we have to the good of the majority of children.  As
> my hero Spock said "the needs of the many outweigh the
> needs of the few."

Great, let's run the educational system based on the wisdom
of a science fiction character (and by the way, where's Ayn Rand
when you need her? *just kidding*).  Maybe you can draw on another
science fiction reference and suggest that gifted students should be
required to take drugs so that they're be closer to average and average
students won't have to feel so inferior. Attending to the needs of the majority
does not preclude meeting the needs of gifted students, it just requires
being creative about how you structure the system.

Michael Atherton
Prospect Park


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to