There have been a number of excellent posts surrounding issues related to 
Stadium financing that I wanted to respond to.  Unfortunately I emptied my 
mail box so I will have to go off memory.

If we can be creative with stadium finance why can't we get creative with 
eduational funding? 

Excellent question, and while I agree we need to figure out how to better 
fund education, the bottom line is that education does not produce the 
revenue streams needed to pay off financing that a stadium could.  Unless 
you want to sell the naming rights to our schools (Old Navy Middle School 
anyone?), education funding is going to have to come from either property 
taxes, income taxes, sales tax, user fees, or some combination. 


Does the stadium funding scheme weaving its way through the legistlature 
have money for a roof? 

I'm not sure.  I thought the $335 Mil was more than enough needed to build a 
roofless stadium but probably not enough to build a roof.  If it's not 
enough for a roof, I'm sure the Twins will be looking for a handout. 


Baseball economics are sick and a new stadium will not change the fact that 
the Twins are a small market team and will need new subsidies in the future. 

The absurdity of paying a shortshop $20 mil to play baseball is apparent to 
everyone.  Unfortunately this argument reminds me of those French 
existentialists who talk about the absurdity of man and the meaninglessness 
of life in the face of our seemingly minimal place in the universe.  Well 
you may be right but that doesn't help me deal with the here and now.  The 
fact is that contraction is very real and if it wasn't for a plucky Hennepin 
County judge, we'd be watching Cristian Guzman hitting triples for the 
Detroit Tigers.  Furthermore if the Twins don't have a new stadium in place 
they will be gone next year. 

By financing a new stadium we reserve a place at the table to demand changes 
to baseball's economic structure.  By providing only a small percentage of 
public dollars to the stadium we are demonstrating that there are 
alternatives to massive public subsidies (most new stadiums have between 80 
and 95 percent public assistance).  Hopefully with a new stadium and a new 
ownership the Twins can band with other similar teams and change baseball's 
structure so that we won't be placed in this predicament again.  Am I 
convinced that this will happen?  No.  But I'm optimistic that it can and I 
am convinced that without a new stadium we will be in no position to make 
sure those changes do happen. 

Dean E. Carlson
East Harriet, Ward 10 
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to