The sponsors of the event at the Urban League had an introductory slide
presentation that was a good start and anybody who came late missed
that.
I wasn't happy with being invited to attend without any instruction
about the intent of the invitation, expecting to observe and listen and
instead being placed at the front of the event and being grilled for
information about negotiations in progress. One staffer claimed to have
made the invitations and my email files show that another actually sent
the RSVP but whatever that authorship the reality is that we
commissioners came as individuals, not as a public body, and I at least
came away without much new to work with during the last five days before
the Commission meets to finalize the details of our draft plan.

It is also inappropriate to label the plan I brought to this event "the
Markus plan" as list member Annie Young has done. The name of this plan
is Green Plan 2, companion to Green Plan 1, and these two plans have
mutually exclusive properties. Both have very small deviations from
optimal population totals, both have promising minority opportunity
characteristics, but Green Plan 1 is drawn in a way that protects all
the incumbents at the expense of some pivotal neighborhoods two of which
have specifically asked not to be split between wards. Green Plan 1 has
no downtown ward. Green Plan 2 is an artful plan that assembles
neighborhoods following the city's planning districts and is less
intrusive of neighborhood boundaries than Green Plan 1. Green Plan 2 has
a downtown ward and displaces several incumbents. These are my
negotiating instruments as the representative of the minority caucus of
the city council and they need to be understood as a brace of
hypothetical options placed alongside other hypothetical options and
subject to further revision during the next few days. There may well be
new complete hypothetical plans emerging, including something from the
NAACP et al., and we'll all have to wait on events and evaluate these
options as they become available.  

I hope the people present last evening and the members of this list join
me in insisting that all the plans that were brought forward at the
Monday evening Commission discussion meeting on March 25 be posted on
the city's website for the public's information. I recall this being
asked for at the Commission meeting and am disturbed along with the
participants in the March 28th community event that we commissioners
were sent scrambling for copies of these several plans. I am also
disturbed that I saw a DFL-sponsored plan in circulation last evening -
DFL Plan 1 - that was not the DFL plan 3-25 that was in fact introduced
at the Monday evening Commission meeting. I must join with other
Commissioners in warning that these draft documents are like draft bills
in the legislature - they are ephemeral creatures until something is
chosen for real by our various dates certain and anything hypothetical
that appears on the city's web site is just that - hypothetical, not
exclusive of other possibilities, and at best descriptive of the
thinking going on and not immediately predictive of any eventual
outcome.

I regret that the people present didn't have a better chance to look at
what we redistricting commissioners have before us - had we been asked
to bring visual materials, had we been asked to be prepared to discuss
our process as the main event of the evening, had we been informed that
there would not be any prepared plan brought to our attention, I for one
could certainly have organized my purposes accordingly. I also want to
leave the list with the clear understanding that I reject the notion
that Green Plan 2 is somehow "the Markus plan" - this connotes
authorship apart from the Green Party whose interests I represent and
doesn't validate the companion plan, Green Plan 1, that further
contextualizes what I'm about in my work on this Commission.  

Fred Markus, Horn Terrace, Ward Ten, Redistricting Commissioner    

_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to