The Strib's definition of terrorism is not a Minneapolis issue. It's a global issue defined by a regional publication.
Yes, there was a meeting announcement about a protest, but it didn't mention terrorism. And just in case people are confused: announcements of a local rally are fine here if they occur in Minneapolis. The reasoning is local people should know about local civic rallies. However, many meeting *subjects* - say, US-Israel policy - are not always a local issues, and therefore not subject to list debate. (And no, because the Strib is located in Minneapolis doesn't make everything it does debatable here.) I'm passing along these rules interpretations for newcomers who aren't familiar or old-timers who need a reminder. David Brauer List manager > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Michael Franklin > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 3:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Mpls] Fwd: Terrorism Is a Term that Requires Consistency > > Below is an analysis of the uses, and misuses, of the word 'terrorism.' The > analysis focuses on a recent exchange between the Star Tribune and MAT > (Minnesotans Against Terrorism). > > Here is MAT's web address: http://www.minnesotansagainstterrorism.org/ _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
