In:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Message: 11
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 00:49:39 -0500
From: "Phyllis Kahn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Mpls] 2003 elections
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Representative Phyllis Kahn really seems to 
provide a good argument for requiring 
Minneapolis elections in 2003.  However, I can 
understand the suspicion and concern that 
many Minneapolis residents may have for 
allowing the timing of the fate of their recently 
elected city hall representation to be in the 
hands of the Minnesota Legislature.  The 
Legislature which is comprised almost 
exclusively of Republicans and Democrats has 
a record of being insensitive about the safety of 
Minneapolis residents on Interstates 94, 394, 
and 35W; Minneapolis homeowners rights; and 
the need for campaign reform. (I believe that 
Minneapolis Legislators and other Minnesota
Legislators are the only governmental group 
in Minnesota that can legally allow their publicly 
paid staff members to work on efforts for 
reelection.)


Neal E, Simons
Prospect Park


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to