2. Free Store:  It is difficult to comprehend why anyone would object to
>this, given the creation of multiple affordable units and the revitalization
>of under-used, low-density land.
><snip>
>
>Tom Donaldson
>Ventura Village


It is not that I object to relocating the free store for
revitalization or gentrification of the area. What I object to is the
loss of a needed service to many people in the community. Supposedly
it closes after business today, with uncertain plans for the future.


I am with the American Indian Housing & Community Development Corporation
which is developing that area with affordable housing. We offered to build a
new building for the Free Store on the same block where they currently are
located and a high-powered person in the community agreed to raise the funds
for a mortgage-free building. The Free Store board declined the offers and
has chosen to go to 24th and Bloomington where they are running into another
development group attempting to build housing there. Some of the people are
far less accomodating and actually see the Free Store as a threat to their
development. This  is really sad, because the Free Store is so vital to the
growth of a low income community into a more healthy one.

They don't have to move their operations until we are actually ready to begin
demolition and asbestos removal prior to construction on the site.

Robert Albee
Special Project Coordinator/Neighborhood Liaison
AIHCDC
2020 Bloomington Avenue South
Minneapolis,  MN  55404
612/813-1610
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to