Thanks Brian for the detailed and clear discussion of the Charter Commission and the 
selection
of the Redistricting Commissioners. Thinking about this topic has raised a couple more
questions.

How come two Green Party members were not selected in the same manner as the 2 DFL, 2
Republican and 2 Independents? I thought after the 2000 election, the Greens achieved 
major
party status in the state. So, was the Redistricting Commission two members short, or 
did the
Green Party fail to submit a list? I apologize if this has already been discussed. I 
was out of
town for the whole first week of April, so I wasn't following this as closely as I 
would have
liked.

The city Charter states:
"Within 15 days after receiving the lists of party nominees and self nominees, the 
Charter
Commission shall select by a majority vote of all of its members, two members from each
major party to serve on the Redistricting Commission, at least one of which must be 
from the
lists submitted by the parties."

Also, I'm not sure if the timing of the meetings and the plan proposals was 
appropriate. 
The Charter tells us:
"A copy of the tentative plan shall be published as a legal notice for the public at 
least
seven (7) days prior to the public hearing on the tentative plan."

I assume that this requirement was fulfilled by the map appearing on the city web site.
However,
I still don't understand how the "tentative plan" map appearing on the city web site 
April
11th, was changed with respect to the Ward 6 boundary, on the final map released 
Friday the
12th. Maybe somebody who was at the public meeting on the 11th can help explain how 
this change
came about. I know the Commission was working under an extremely tight timeline, and I 
hope
that changes next time around, but it makes no sense to me that the tentative plan 
would be
altered, at the last minute, after the public meeting, without re-publishing a new map 
and
holding another meeting.

Conor Donnelly
waite park
ward one, precinct 2
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to