Michael Anderson wrote:
>You talk about private schools serving the disabled and
>disruptive. We seem to be talking about vouchers for
>private school education, so I will make it plain that I do
>support them. And I will agree, along with all those other
>conservatives, that you can't force a private school to take
>any kid against their will. It's not private anymore if the
>State makes decisions on their enrollment. What I've always
>figured you could do with this issue is to increase the
>amount of the voucher for disabled kids. If you paid more
>for a kid that's disabled than for one that isn't, I'm sure
>there would be private schools willing to take these kids.
>That way these kids could also benefit from vouchers. I bet
>there are many parents of the disabled who would like the
>option of a private school also.
Another take on this is the notion of private schools
specifically for disabled or disruptive students, that would
concentrate specifically on problems unique to those students.
Either way, the important thing is seeing that these children
have their problems dealt with and get as much education as
they are capable of absorbing.
Cordially,
Kevin Trainor
RPM Candidate HD 61A
East Phillips
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
