I plan to provide a series of messages in regard
to deficiencies in various areas of Minneapolis
government.  With the recent election of certain 
officials, who have demonstrated a refreshing 
concern about representing the rank and file of 
Minneapolis residents, we can all anticipate a 
renewed pride in being Minneapolitans.  
However, ordinary citizens have a responsibility 
for helping our elected leaders, as well as 
those who are immediately involved, locate the 
governmental problem areas that require attention. 

In this message, I will discuss the chronic
problem of the Office of the City Clerk in 
frequently not having provided sufficient notice 
of various meetings, including hearings, and 
how there was a partial improvement in 
providing for the notices of this week of May 
twentieth.

For the Weekly Meeting Schedule of  
May 13-17, 2002 there was only an advance
notice of about five and a half hours for the 
Ways & Means/Budget meeting.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Subj:    Weekly Meeting Schedule of May 13 - 17, 2002
Date:   5/13/02 7:42:25 AM Central Daylight Time

Minneapolis City Council Committees & Functions
Week of May 13, 2002


All meetings are in the Council Chamber, 317 City Hall, unless noted.

MONDAY (5/13)

1:30 p.m. - *Ways & Means/Budget

4:30 - Planning Commission

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

However, this was an improvement over the
timing of the previous week's announcement:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Subj:    City Schedule for Week of May 6
Date:   5/6/02 10:36:14 AM Central Daylight Time

MONDAY (5/6)

1:30 p.m. - *Community Development
    Public Hearings: (1:30) a)  North Washington Industrial Park:
Consider Modification #14 to the Redevelopment Plan and Modification #90 to
the Common Plan.
    b)  University Gateway Project (200 Oak Street SE):  Consider
issuance of up to $8,000,000 in non-profit facility Revenue Bonds for
facility improvements.

Minneapolis Community Development Agency Operating Committee follows
Community Development meeting
     
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

My neighborhood includes the 200 Oak Street 
SE location which is about one mile west of my 
home.  Consequently, I have an interest in this 
project because of its location as well as the 
public funds that are involved.

I do not think that giving notice less than three 
hours in advance is satisfactory.  Why couldn't
the notice had been made by late Friday 
afternoon?  The Office of the City Clerk may feel
that their notice is not the first notice that this 
hearing has had.  Let us examine the 
possibilities of earlier notices.

It is my understanding that this particular public 
hearing had notices on the following basis:

- 45-day early notice to the School Board, City 
Planning Commission and the neighborhood 
group.

- 30-day transmittal to all interested parties 
which includes the three mentioned above 
plus some property owners, City Council, 
Hennepin County and also anyone else that 
has requested notice (for this specific 
purpose?).

- 30-days before the public hearing a notice is 
put in both the Star Tribune and the Finance & 
Commerce newspapers.

I don't believe that the above notices would be 
very helpful to the typical Minneapolis resident.

The Office of the City Clerk performs a very
valuable service to Minneapolis residents with
its emailing of city scheduling -- but only when
an adequate length of time is provided for 
notices of meetings.

The newest notice of meetings was sent out
on Thursday, May seventeenth which provides   
more Weekly Meeting Schedule advance notice
than I ever recall experiencing:

"Subj:   Weekly Meeting Schedule of May 20 - 24, 2002
Date:   5/17/02 3:10:05 PM Central Daylight Time"

However, an amended notice was issued on 
Monday, May twentieth: 

"Subj:   Weekly Schedule of 5/20/2002 AMENDED
Date:   5/20/02 10:09:21 AM Central Daylight Time"

This amended notice announced a Monday 
meeting at 8:00 PM (over two hours in arrears) 
and other changes, including the addition of a 
Saturday meeting.

I hope that the Office of the City Clerk is able 
to maintain the apparent attempt at improvement.  
Perhaps improvement may be hindered because 
of laxness in getting information to the Office of 
the City Clerk in a timely fashion.  

Call the Office of the City Clerk at (612) 
673-2215 or 673-3130 if you are interested in 
receiving the Weekly Meeting Schedules by 
email.

In my next "Deficiencies in Minneapolis 
Government" message, I will discuss the 
problem that the Minneapolis Community 
Development Agency apparently has in 
identifying and providing information about 
its projects.  The "University Gateway 
Project" will be cited as an example.

Neal E. Simons
Prospect Park


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to