First, I apologize, Mr. Atherton. I did not mean to incite you with
my previous comments.
Having spent 20+ years in education, largely in the capacity of drafting
policy, grant writing and filing state student and staff reports upon
which funding is generated, I am very familiar with all programs, their
historical background, their effectiveness and where they are or are not
today.
PSEO was not designed for students to get a jump on college. That
may have been how it was perceived in the metro, but out state it gave
students the opportunity to take courses that were not available in their
high schools due to enrollment and funding constraints. It quickly
developed into a program whereby students could take vocational courses,
and just as quickly, school districts discovered that it was to their
benefit, financially, not to report these students as PSEO students, but
claim them as a full ADM and pay the Vo-techs tuition from their general
fund. This is now done throughout the state -- even in Minneapolis,
and these students are not reflected in the State PSEO participation
counts.
School-to-Career [Work] programs have been in existence for at least 18
years. They have been and are still very successful, under any
name. I had one high school Sophomore begin her work experience
career with me, and she was with me the entire three years of high
school. I mention her because she was from a dysfunctional family,
lived in foster homes periodically, and she had absolutely no resources
to continue her education after high school. Today, she holds a
responsible, well-paying position is a supervisor for Weigh
Tronics. My late husband had a young man in the program whom he
trained as a shoe repair person. Today the young man owns a very
successful shop in Iowa.
"I want students to be able to
graduate from high school with marketable job skills. I want
students to be able to take vocational courses without being
"tracked" and at the same time maintain academic standards in
core and content courses." Atherton
Don't we all...... and I do believe schools are striving
to accomplish this through their offering of comprehensive technology
courses in accounting, drafting, computer science, foods, small engine,
auto mechanics to name just a few. As to tracking -- students track
themselves -- counselors aren't the final word. I have a daughter
who didn't know if she wanted to be a math teacher or get involved in
business. She took 1 semester advanced calculus and 1 semester
accounting. A close friend of hers took a mix of
vocational and International Baccalaureate courses because while she
wanted to be an engineer she knew she would have to get a really good
part-time job if she was going to be able to fund her college
education. Most high school students do know what they want and
what they need to do to get it.
I don't believe schools are "shucking their own responsibility"
and blaming their ills on parents. As a friend stated:
Minneapolis and St. Paul schools don't have a problem; the communities
have problems that need to be addressed if a child is to learn. The
major problem being one of survival. Schools can only provide a
safe place for learning 360 minutes a day, approximately 175 days out of
the year. It is very difficult for a child to learn if they live in
fear for their safety and the safety of their family. Michael, I
will be sending you information on the extinct Parent Involvement
Program. In fact the department published a whole notebook for us,
and if I can locate that, it's yours. You are right, after being a
dismal disappointment, PIP was left up to individual school districts.
The general public may or may not be interested in the myriad of
programs, processes and procedures in public education, so I will not
belabor the issues. However if anyone would like information
concerning a specific programs, including those designed to lower class
size; and the name of a contact person at the CFL just let me know and I
will send you that information. The CFL staff that I've dealt with
are very helpful and willing to provide information.
Heidi
- Re: [Mpls] Erickson's Positions on school policy Is... Michael Atherton
- [Mpls] Education in the City Heidi Schmidt
- RE: [Mpls] Education in the City W. Brandon Lacy Campos
- Heidi Schmidt
