In a message dated 6/26/02 8:24:27 AM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
The 52 unit number was calculated solely on the difference between
demolition permits and new construction permits for the five year period of
1997-2001, ignoring units made available by rehab or as part of multi unit
construction. The MCDA Multifamily program alone, for example, reported to
McKinsey earlier this year that MCDA Multifamily housing production for the
5-year period from 1996 to 2001 was 7,475 units (new and rehab).
>>
Keith Says; Conversely, the 52 unit number, as it reported demolition permits
minus construction permits, surely undercounted multi unit demolitions, too.
There were plenty in the hood. Is undercounting downside part of the MCDA
outlook?
Keith Reitman NearNorth PS My SpellCheck offers "Madcap" as a correction for
MCDA!
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls
