Wizard is correct, in her assertion that we can not return the City to
what it was before "Freeways". I put "Freeways" in this way because
they were anything but free.  The City of Minneapolis paid a gigantic
and horrific price to allow to allow Minnesota and the suburbs to thrive.
It gave up billions of tax dollars from the property lost and the
devastation of its inner-city commercial corridors. MnDOT, and the
suburban legislators, would do well to remember who made that
possible and upon whose backs you rode to  get what you have.

Now let's talk "Mitigation".  MnDOT and their lackeys, the
Access Committee, would have us believe that mitigation dollars should
be spent on improving "their" Freeway.  This is analogous to the tobacco
companies asking that the damages from the tobacco settlement be spent
to improve the looks of their billboard ads.  This "Mitigation" money
is to compensate for DAMAGE. Those damages should be compensated
to the damaged party, not to the party doing the damage.

Before we start talking about new damage, such as adding new lanes to the
Freeways, lets talk about a fair and equitable settlement of the damage
claims the communities of Minneapolis have from the original building of
the freeways. There should have been a development fund set up from
which damaged communities could draw for development projects to
compensate for what was lost. It should be set up now!

In addition to a development fund the Federal Government and MnDOT
should fulfill promises made to the residents of Minneapolis in order to get
the freeways accepted originally. We need the freeway decked as originally
promised, so as to reweave the fabric of Minneapolis and to return tax-base
to
the City.  This has been accomplished in many U.S. cities and their is no
reason, (other than laziness on the part of our politicians, and reluctance
on
the part of small-minded MnDOT Engineers), to not have this promise
fulfilled. For those list members who are not informed of this issue go to
www.venturavillage.org and look up section on decking the freeways.

Congressman Martin Sabo has said he is willing to peruse this matter,
but that the Minneapolis Mayor (RT Rybak) and the City Council,
or the Metropolitan Council had to request such an action.  The Met
Council may not be sympathetic to the needs of Minneapolis and
transit-oriented development, but we can certainly hold RT and our
City Council' feet to the fire. All the cities that are touted by the City
and Met Council as models of urban development are or already have
decked their freeways. These paragons of planning include, but aren't
limited to, Portland, Seattle,  Phoenix, (dare we say Duluth).

We have the most powerful member of the US Congress' Transportation
Committee representing us and our local elected officials are to shy or
stupid
to ask for the same consideration.  MAYBE WE SHOULD ASK THAT A
STADIUM BE PLACED ON IT FOR THEM TO TAKE SOME
INTEREST. As ludicrous as it sounds that is exactly how we got the head of
Minneapolis planning to start considering it.

So here is a suggested plan for addressing the freeway access and I-35
situation.
1. Set up a task force of truly representative impacted community
organizations
Lets call it the " Urban Freeway Land-Use and Mitigation Task Force" or
some such other meaningless title.
2. Immediately request our fair share of Federal and State Freeway
mitigation
dollars. If this does not pay immediate dividends perhaps DEMAND, and
a Federal Legal Action would be more appropriate. But first lets allow
Martin Sabo to work a little magic for us.
3. Set up a Development Mitigation Fund to assist impacted neighborhoods
address the injury they have already incurred by redeveloping their
commercial
and housing base.
4. Start realistic community involved planning for the freeways so as to get
the
most benefit for OUR residents from them. (If we are paying the fiddler, we
better darn well get some tunes we want to dance to)

I am sure there are others with even better suggestions about getting a
freeway
system that OUR residents can use. By "our", I mean the communities of
Minneapolis that have sustained damage from and through which "Freeways"
pass.

Jim Graham,
Ventura Village





_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to