I want to agree with all the kudos today for Scott Dibble for
Senate and then add one more piece, since several people
asked about how Roche could finance TV ads in these final
days of the campaign.
 
I went over to the Campaign Finance Board office yesterday
to look up a couple of things (on my own time, as always),
and while there took a look at Roche's report.
 
As someone suggested, he indeed has not agreed to abide
by our state system of checkoff/public financing/spending
limits that has been a national model for clean government.
(While it's true that this is a voluntary system, we are also
free to criticize him in the arena of political opinion, for
failing to participate in a system that we believe promotes
clean government).  Because of this, he is not subject to
spending limits, but also is not subject to the $20,000 limit
on what candidates for senate can spend on themselves.
 
The report shows that through the August 19, 2002 reporting
period, he contributed about $5K to himself, loaned himself
about another $6K, received contributions of over $2K from
people named Roche (one assumes family), and received
another $2K from other donors.  So through August 19, he
had about $15K to spend on the primary, roughly comparable
to the $18K that Scott Dibble had raised in the same period.
 
What's interesting is that on August 29, he amended his
report to show that he had loaned himself an additional $21K
to bring the total to $36K.  That's a lot of money for a state
senate primary!  And one can only wonder if the loan was
made purposely after the reports were due in and campaigns
had already looked at each other's reports.  Maybe they
thought no one would see it.  Maybe they're going to loan
themselves a lot more money this week.
 
Again, there's nothing illegal about all this.  However, voters
are free to decide they don't like it and add it to the already
long list of reasons to vote for Scott Dibble.
 
Don Jorovsky
(about two miles north of Minneapolis)
 
 
(Postscript:  I used the word "about" above because he
contributed $4920, which I would say is about $5K, and
he loaned himself a total of $26,980, which I would say
is about $27K and not worth quibbling about)
 
 


Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com

Reply via email to