On 9/25/02 2:32 PM, "Eva Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> As I recall the faculty are not universally supportive of the University
> making this stadium a priority - because many faculty feel that it's
> putting athletics ahead of the U's primary mission.
> 
> I would agree with that one.

I would agree with that as well.  However, it has also been argued that
bringing Gopher football back to campus would increase athletic department
revenues and reduce the need for subsides from the University's general
fund.  So it's not quite as simple as portrayed above.
 
> Let the NFL extend their deadline for the $50,000 contribution towards the
> stadium.  They want it -- they should invest in it.

Um, that's $50 million that the NFL would contribute, not $50,000.
 
> There's also a real problem if the traffic to stadium events makes it hard
> for evening and weekend students to get to classes.

Um, as a still relatively recent U of MN graduate (class of 1997), I can
tell you that weekend classes are nearly nonexistent - especially on Sundays
when NFL games are played.  And the libraries are far away enough from where
the stadium is proposed that I really doubt Viking traffic would pose much
interference.

And hopefully students would refrain from registering for Saturday classes
in the rare instance that one might be offered so they can go "Rah, Rah, Rah
for Ski-U-Mah!" instead. :-)

Maybe there might be a problem if the Vikings had a game scheduled for
Monday Night Football, but that might happen once or twice a season at most.

Students who had weeknight classes were usually disrupted more by Gopher
basketball or hockey games until Parking and Transportation Services came up
with a placard that students could register to get for their car to prove
they were on campus for class and not a sporting event so they wouldn't get
charged the event parking rates.

I agree, however, with some of the points of Mr. Mosedale's article.  The
timeline for working out all these details is pretty skimpy, especially
since I've yet to see the Vikings adequately explain why renovating the Dome
would not solve their revenue concerns.  Unlike the Twins, who have been
losing money for years, the Vikings have been making a profit - apparently
just not enough of one to satisfy Mr. McCombs.

I'm all in favor of bringing the Gophers back to campus where they belong
and if any football stadium is built, that should be the primary focus.  If
the Vikings want to be a part of that, fine, but any demands they have
should be secondary to the wishes of the University.

Mark Snyder
Windom Park (59A)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  


_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A Civil City Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest option, and more:
http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to