I forwarded Victoria Hellers post a few days ago to Council Member Barret
Lane and asked him to respond.  He asked me to post this message for him:

I think it is fair to say that there is, as yet, no complete plan for which
the Mayor and Council takes ownership. However, we have made substantial
progress toward that goal. Here is a status report, from my perspective:

The objective is basically this: Bring property-tax supported expenditures,
including past deficits, into line with reasonably available revenues by
2010 while at the same time preserving as much of the current service level
in core city businesses as possible. We will move into five-year planning
mode as the means to make this happen.

Part of the plan is already known. First, we have developed a diagnostic
tool (the ten-year projection) and we have used that tool to communicate the
problem to relevant stakeholders. The projection is incorporated into the
Mayor's recommended budget. So, the scope of the project is generally known
and generally accepted within and without City government. That is a major
accomplishment in and of itself. People have to understand the need for
change before they will support it.

Second, we have adopted financial principles. We have returned to these to
make sure we are sticking to our agreement with one another as to what
values will drive our decision-making.

Third, we have set some outside parameters on resources. Whatever is done to
bring expenses in line with revenues will be done within the context of the
8% levy policy. That is, we have defined the size of the pie.

Fourth, we must make decisions about how the pie is divided between
functions (public safety, public works, development, etc.) for purposes of
planning for the next five years. This has been the focus of six strategic
planning retreats which conclude this week. The mayor and council will be
adopting new City goals and objectives to facilitate creating five-year
plans. The focus will shift from yearly cuts to total available resources
over time.

Fifth, the Council and Mayor's decisions about how long-term resources will
be allocated will be turned over to the City's professional management for
development of five-year business plans. As part of this process, the
council and mayor will have to weigh alternative strategies for delivering a
maximum amount of the current service level within the financial restraints
dictated by the levy policy and our strategic plan. We may have to consider
whether we can fund all of the commitments we have made or whether we will
need to scale back on some commitments. At this point, it is too early to
say what those strategies or choices will be. While there is no date set for
the plans to be approved, I suspect that they will be before the council in
the first quarter of 2003.

Finally, the Mayor's budget for 2003 is, in my opinion, a transitional
budget. It is a bridge between the year-by-year budget process of the past
and the proposed five-year process. Adoption of the budget for this year
will set the stage for the changes to come.

Barret W.S. Lane
Council Member -- Ward 13
Fulton Neighborhood

Victorias post:

> It would be nice to hear from the Mayor and Council on the looming BUDGET
> CRISIS!!!!!
>
> What's the plan for whacking at the $1.5 Billion worth of DEBT?
>
> What's the plan for closing the $237 million SPENDING DEFICIT?
>
> What's the plan for collecting from old and new DEADBEATS?
>
> I don't think it does much good for Listmembers to debate these issues -
> because we have no authority to ACT.  Darn.
>
> Could we please hear from the people we pay to address these problems.
>
> Vicky Heller
> North Oaks and Cedar-Riverside
>
> _______________________________________
>
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
> Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
>


_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to