-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 10 October 2002 17:29, Gibson, Kristi wrote:

[regarding a possible $1.5MM budget shortfall in the MPL]

> Therefore, the Library Board will need to enact one or more of the
> following service reductions for 2003:

[dire acts deleted for brevity]

Could someone from the Library please detail what technology spending looks 
like for the Library? I've seen a lot of (new) fancy automated checkout 
machines that certainly cost more than the expense of a checkout clerk's 
annual salary (I also rarely see them used, which is the real problem). 
I've also noticed that the library seems to be running fairly recent 
releases of Microsoft software... so I have to ask if the collection 
management software the library uses is dependent on Windows, or if the 
book database isn't on some serious hardware and most of those windows 
machines are simply clients.

If the latter is true, there is almost no justification for the expense of 
licensing Windows for any new client machines (for instance, the 
ubiquitous "internet terminals"), if you ask me. In my home I run only 
Free Software  (that's free as in freedom, see http://www.gnu.org/ for 
more information), and I am able to run a lot of pretty fancy software, 
all of which cost me nothing but download time to acquire and all of which 
I am allowed to reprogram (as I am given the source code) and all of which 
I am free to share with my neighbor. It don't get any better than that!

Obviously existing seat licenses and hardware are paid for and no effort 
should be exerted to replace them until necessary, but hopefully the 
replacement cost of technology is considered carefully in the ongoing tech 
strategy. A partial migration to Free Software should be strongly 
considered at least as a pilot test, so that a real world study of the 
costs and other factors can be compared somewhere besides a financial 
planners spreadsheet.

Looking at the 2001 Annual Report I do not see a single line item that 
would appear to contain this sort of technology expense, so maybe you've 
got $1.5MM hiding in there somewhere. But it appears as if the only real 
place you're going to find a cushion the size of $1.5 million is in staff 
expense, so whatever solution you settle on pretty much has to have its 
largest impact in that area. Too bad, librarians are people I'd like to 
see stay employed, it's one of the professions I respect the most.

I'd suggest no libraries open on Sunday as first step. Why should just a 
handful be open on that day? Doesn't make sense to me... I don't think one 
of my nearby libraries is even open on Saturday!

Next, is there a community library that is significantly less visited than 
the rest, or could be somehow folded into a nearby facility? As I've never 
managed to make use of it myself, I'd suggest Webber Park (although maybe 
if it were open on Saturdays I'd find it more useful). North Regional 
isn't far away, and isn't a library going in at the Grain Belt brewery 
site? That's not too far away either.

The collection itself seems like a bad place to cut spending, unless there 
are creative ideas that could lower spending without reducing overall 
effectiveness. Perhaps certain popular books could have shorter loan 
spans? No renewals on videos? Less duplication of the collection across 
branches, especially in the periodicals department (so many periodicals 
have web versions these days... and there's plenty of internet access to 
be had at the library)? I'm just throwing out ideas here.

 -michael libby (cleveland neighborhood/north mpls)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Michael C. Libby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
public key: http://www.ichimunki.com/public_key.txt
web site: http://www.ichimunki.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9pjPa4ClW9KMwqnMRAtaoAJ9K0DbCYklbWQzOLW6rSURX5q1YTQCePa6d
4SfZWbTCaBWgsHO/1RbpMOU=
=0+iy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to