While doorknocking for a candidate several weeks ago I came upon one of
the judges who is being discussed in this thread. We got into a lengthy
discussion of issues, ranging from the size of civil judgements
nationally (e.g., billions for an ex-smoker) and the possible need for
tort reform; judicial resignations followed by Gubernatorial
appointments and whether they make a mockery of Minnesota's judicial
elections; and whether Minnesota's family law practice might be biased
against males. I have never met so Panglossian a candidate--we have the
best of all possible judicial worlds here in Minnesota--nothing needs
improvement!
This all makes me lean against voting for this incumbent. But there was
another factor, and I apologize that it is personal, and relates to an
infirmary. But it does seems relevent.
This judge was wearing two hearing aids, and frequently I had to repeat
myself to be heard. I wondered--maybe some knowledgeable attorney can
email me off-list--whether that creates a problem in the courtroom. If
a judge has trouble hearing does that impact their ability to do their
job when there is nuanced arguments and participants with varied
speaking volumes, styles and clarity?
Maybe this person has additional accomodations in their courtroom, or
maybe I just mumble. My wife thinks so.
Alan Shilepsky
who appreciates the time this candidate took to talk with me
Downtown Mpls
_______________________________________
Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
- [Mpls] More on Judicial Races Jordan Kushner
- Re: [Mpls] More on Judicial Races Alan Shilepsky
- Re: [Mpls] More on Judicial Races Lisa McDonald
- Re: [Mpls] More on Judicial Races Lisa McDonald
