While doorknocking for a candidate several weeks ago I came upon one of the judges who is being discussed in this thread. We got into a lengthy discussion of issues, ranging from the size of civil judgements nationally (e.g., billions for an ex-smoker) and the possible need for tort reform; judicial resignations followed by Gubernatorial appointments and whether they make a mockery of Minnesota's judicial elections; and whether Minnesota's family law practice might be biased against males. I have never met so Panglossian a candidate--we have the best of all possible judicial worlds here in Minnesota--nothing needs improvement!

This all makes me lean against voting for this incumbent. But there was another factor, and I apologize that it is personal, and relates to an infirmary. But it does seems relevent.
This judge was wearing two hearing aids, and frequently I had to repeat myself to be heard. I wondered--maybe some knowledgeable attorney can email me off-list--whether that creates a problem in the courtroom. If a judge has trouble hearing does that impact their ability to do their job when there is nuanced arguments and participants with varied speaking volumes, styles and clarity?
Maybe this person has additional accomodations in their courtroom, or maybe I just mumble. My wife thinks so.

Alan Shilepsky
who appreciates the time this candidate took to talk with me
Downtown Mpls


_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to