Again, a post from Tom Johnson just vague enough to
imply that the folks in question agree with him.  No
doubt that these people, as most everyone else, have
complex opinions of the project, but anyone who speaks
with them will not go away with the impression that
they support the Access Project, as Tom implied in
this post and even to Council Member Lilligren, among
others!  This is beginning to feel very "Orwellian".

David Piehl
Central

--- Tom Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, I really hope that in the future those
> posting giving their views on
> how others in the South Mpls. community feel about
> or toward the I-35W
> Access Project will contact and talk with that
> person before stating their
> opposition to the Project.  Three people have been
> named in recent postings
> as being Project opponents.  I have met with and
> spoken by phone with all
> three.  I know their respective positions and
> suggest that those who want to
> post their positions should ask them first.  They
> are not being accurately
> reported.  I only ask for this out of fairness to
> those people and all
> others who are likely to be quoted in the future. 
> Thank-you  Tom Johnson,
> Smith Parker-612/344-1400.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:BOlson9572@;aol.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Johnson;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mpls] RE: [central-traffic] Support?
> 
> 
> Nutz to being okay with the businesses and homes
> being taken down. I too
> know 
> Edna is NOT okay with it. I think Whittier has
> really made the fact clear, 
> not build..
> Nothing more to say...
> BeckyOlson
> Whittier


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:mpls@;mnforum.org
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to