Doug Mann wrote:
> 5) The reason some of your 3rd grade students are reading at a
> first grade level is that they were not learning how to decode words in
grades
> one and two.  Phonics instruction was either extremely ineffective or
didn't
> happen at all.  This is a problem for a lot of 3rd grade teachers because
> the districtwide reading curriculum is based on the look-say method.
>
Mark here:
Oh come on Doug!  Now you seem to be saying that any differences in reading
skills between kids is due to poor teaching?  There are no differences that
arise due to differences in intelligence, environment, or study habits?
This is similar to your comment to Lynnell that if a teacher teaches
something the kids will learn it.  I know that my kids have been taught lots
of stuff that didn't take - maybe your kids are geniuses, but most of us
aren't so blessed.

It's these sort of nonsensical comments that make me scared of a school
system following your precepts.  If you were in charge of the school system
it seems that teachers would be judged primarily on the achievement gap
between his/her students, not the actual advances by each student, since any
gaps could only be explained by deficient teaching.

Doug again:
> Commonly used remediation strategies (e.g., drill and kill) are generally
> more effective as behavior management tools than as learning strategies.

Mark here:
My Sixth Grade son never has learned his addition facts very well, because
his First and Second Grade teachers apparently shared your belief that drill
doesn't work.  This has caused him problems ever since in learning higher
Math skills, since it's hard to do estimating and word problems correctly
when you are concentrating on just doing the computations.  Luckily his
Third Grade teacher did believe in drill, so he knows his multiplication
pretty well.

Mark Anderson
Bancroft



_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to