As far as the storm water runoff , I would disagree with Mark's assumptions.
Front yard setbacks must be approximately the same on all contstruction that
has been done in Mpls, so the yards are basically the same for a 3 lot 22
unit building and 3 houses or duplexes.  As far as the rear, a 22 unit
building will have the parking lot and the homes will probably have a 20'
garage which will cover 1/2 the width of the lot.  So at the most, the
runoff would be double for the 22 unit versus the 3 houses.  Currently the
rate charged is 7 1/2 times more for the 22 unit, which is not exactly
equitable.  You can confirm this info by looking at the case of JAS
Apartments v. The City of Minneapolis (File # 00-17717) which is going in
front of the Appellate Court in the very near future.

Steve Meldahl
Jordan (work)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Minneapolis Issues Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Uptown Apartment Bldgs Sold (City Regulations Blamed)


>
> I can't speak with authority on #1, but I can say that Steve Meldahl is
> incorrect with his assumption in #2.  The reason for this is because the
> three houses on three lots are surrounded by three yards that absorb storm
> water whereas the 22 unit building on three lots has a great deal more
paved
> surface area (especially if there's off-street parking as well) that does
> not absorb storm water and it must instead run off into the storm sewers.
>
> Whether there's enough of that going on to justify the price difference
> Steve cites, I don't know, but there are justifiable grounds for having a
> price difference.  Especially when we consider just how much water is
being
> lost to the storm sewer system rather than replenishing our ground water
> through infiltration (sinking back into the ground).
>
> According to a report issued this past August, Minneapolis ranks among the
> top ten metropolitan areas in ground water infiltration losses.  Based on
> 1997 figures, we lose around 21 billion gallons of water per year.  This
is
> more than double what was lost annually in 1982, when it was 9 billion
> gallons annually.
>
> Why is this important?  Because diminishing ground water supplies
> contributes to drought conditions.  And of course, since we all have to
have
> pristine green lawns, we consume even more water to maintain them.
>
> Those interested can read more at:
> http://www.americanrivers.org/landuse/sprawldroughtreport.htm#execsum
>
> And if you're wondering what you can do to reduce your impact on storm
water
> runoff, a simple thing is to redirect the downspouts on your gutters so
that
> they empty onto your lawn or garden (away from your house, of course) and
> not a paved surface like a driveway or sidewalk.
>
> And if you really want to make a difference, you can quit water your lawn
> during the driest part of the summer and allow it to go dormant as nature
> intended.  I haven't watered  my lawn in about 20 years.  It still comes
> back just fine every spring.
>
> Mark Snyder
> Windom Park (59A)
>
> On 11/18/02 9:05 PM, "steven meldahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You are not quite right on this matter.  Steve Frenz is complaining
based on
> > 2 reasons:
> >
> > 1. Sewer rates for homes and duplexes are based on water consumption
levels
> > during low-use winter months,  while sewer rates for all others are
based on
> > actual water use, including the high-use summer months - see the
difference?
> >
> > 2. The cost of storm sewer projects is based on water consumption, not
on
> > the size of the lot as it should be.  I do not think it rains more
heavily
> > on apartment buildings than houses or duplexes.  A 22 unit building that
> > sits on 3 city lots does not produce any more runoff than 3 houses on
the
> > same 3 lots, yet their proportion is 7 times higher - see the
difference?
> >
> <snip>
> >
> > Steve Meldahl
> > Jordan (work)
>
> _______________________________________
>
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to