List - 

Here's a link to an op-ed published in today's New
York Times. It's about middle class parents fighting
to get their kids into gifted and talented programs in
the New York City public schools. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/25/opinion/25POLL.html

In light of list discussions about schools, I wonder
how parents of MPS kids would compare the op-ed
writer's experience with NYC gifted and talented
programs with MPS programs. 

Has anyone volunteered at their favorite Minneapolis
public school in order to help out their kid's chances
of being admitted?  If so does it work?  Anyone know
if it is a common practice? 

Again, this is pretty wholesome stuff, we're talking
about offering one's time, not stock options.  

Caitlin Pine

Lyndale by day
Powderhorn by night 

In case the link breaks here's the text of the
article:



November 25, 2002

Public School Confidential

By KATHA POLLITT

    As a public school parent, I should be enjoying a
moment of blissful moral superiority at the expense of
JackGrubman, the superstar telecommunications analyst
accused of hyping AT&T as part of a deal to get his
twins
into the 92nd Street Y's exclusive preschool.
Manhattan's public schools may be understaffed and
underfunded, but at
least they're egalitarian in their admissions
policies. Aren't they?

Unfortunately, not really. I doubt anyone's rocked the
stock market to get their child into one of the city
schools'
programs for gifted and talented students, but that
doesn't mean competition for the limited number of
slots in these
schools isn't fierce � and that it isn't stacked in
favor of middle-class families.

I saw this firsthand 10 years ago as I looked for a
kindergarten in Manhattan Districts 2 and 3 for my
daughter. The
"hotter" the school or program, the more we
prospective parents were told about the thousands of
dollars parents
donated for art, music and supplies, the "frills" that
were vanishing from the system overall. A school's
heat could be
gauged too by the preponderance of white faces �
principals, teachers, parent volunteers � in charge of
these visits.
At some schools you could measure the rising
temperature by the increasing paleness of the
students: the fifth grade
might look like Trinidad, but the kindergarten looked
more like Bavaria. On paper those schools were
triumphs of
integration; in reality, they were in transition.

What do Manhattan parents do to get their little ones
into the top public elementary schools? They do what I
did: They
get someone � friends with kids in the school, someone
connected, someone famous � to put in a word, and they
write sycophantic letters in which they profess
allegiance to the school's educational philosophy,
promise to work their
tails off for the parents association and read their
child French fairy tales at bedtime.

Some go further: they fake an address in a district,
or better yet in an upscale catchment area with an
excellent zoned
school � Greenwich Village for Public School 41, the
Upper East Side for P.S. 6, the West 70's and 80's for
P.S. 87.
They prep their kids for I.Q. tests and for interviews
masked as classroom visits. Will your 4-year-old have
a meltdown
when you drop her off in a roomful of strangers? There
goes Harvard.

In a pinch, parents can turn to consultants like the
folks at Smart City Kids, an organization primarily
devoted to
helping parents get their children into private
schools but which also offers workshops ($195 for two
and a half hours)
geared toward the public schools' gifted and talented
programs. Free tip offered on the Web site: "The
application
process for some of the most selective public schools
in New York City often begins a year before your child
is
scheduled to start school. Allow yourself this year's
time to do the research." How many working-class
parents can
spend a year prenavigating the system?

Given the state of the public schools, we parents
don't have much choice but to pocket our qualms, if we
have them,
and knock ourselves out. I was thrilled when my
daughter was accepted to the Lab School (was it the
letter?) and
eventually to Stuyvesant, the public high school whose
challenging entrance exam has spawned prep courses as
far
away as Hong Kong and Taiwan.

Still, the fact is the schools and programs in demand
are oases of comparative privilege in a desert of
deprivation:
middle-class, disproportionately white enclaves often
located within school buildings that are almost
entirely minority
and largely poor. At one program I visited, the
administrator who showed prospective parents around
boasted that
students had science three times a week, not once a
week like the children in the regular school � a troop
of whom
happened to be walking past her as she spoke. What
kind of message are those kids getting?

The number of good schools and good programs is still
tiny. As long as that's the case, most parents who can
do so
will move mountains on behalf of their own children �
mountains of cash for the Jack Grubmans, or of
singlemindedness and savvy, with maybe a little bit of
string-pulling, for many of us. But what about
everyone else?

Katha Pollitt is a columnist for The Nation.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus � Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to