Gary Bowman wrote:
I didn't mention this in my original post, but I am inWM: This was my early experience in renting the other half of my duplex early on. I got stiffed for a huge amount of money (for me, in the first year of owning the house) by people who called themselves friends.
a house that was turned into a duplex. When I first
purchased the place five years ago, I rented the
upstairs out to people I **personally knew**. Ultimately, I didn't get paid a lot of rent and ended
up going through the very unpleasant process of
evicting them because of it. Plus, these people kept
their living space in such horrible filth, I was
constantly worried about pest infestation.
My solution was very different, however. I went to the Inspections Dept. thinking to have my house re-designated as single family, though it had earliest been a duplex, then a rooming house, then a shelter for battered women and children, then vacant for over a year.
Inspections told me that there is a designation, "duplex being used as a single family." I still live on the first floor and my two or three roommates (this fluctuates to a certain extent) live upstairs. My intention in buying this building was only to have help in paying the mortgage and the basic bills, but I found a very wonderful home with delightful roommates (house mates, really) and we have become an intentional family as a result. We even have a daughter, though she's grown up now (an excellent process to participate in, good mental and emotional growth was had by all). Every person here had been homeless or as near homeless as makes no difference (sofa surfing and dumpster diving).
We have luxuries we never dreamed we could have (three bathrooms, three phone numbers, two computers even, washer and dryer, an address, a way to stabilize to find employment, store bought food every day). My house mates even allow me to live mostly alone, something I've dreamed of since I was 10. There are tons of creative solutions to the affordable housing dilemma being tried successfully every day.
I had to give up the notion of living entirely alone, but what I got in exchange was a gold mine. No money, of course, but I've lived so long without it I daresay a sudden flood of bucks would make me giddy and foolish.
WizardMarks, Central
Have you considered that maybe people get into the rental business to serve a needed function (and again, I repeat it is a needed function of the city. A lot of people aren't willing and/or ready for home ownership)? Yes, they make some cash, but shouldn't they make something for the risk they take? Why do so many on this list seem to believe that people should put their money and effort into the city and get absolutely nothing in return? This is a completely unreasonable belief. I personally have at least not asked for massive subsidies for my investment, not even -at least thus far- NRP dollars for home repairs. What I seem to hear in subtle manner too often on the list is that every person who is willing to risk their own cash they've worked hard for in the city is nothing but a soulless bloodsucking human being. Then you wonder why there's some animosity. Gary Bowman Audubon Park --- Andy Driscoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:This post points up a major problem with the rental business. Landlords see themselves at war with their own clients - their renters. If any business were this miserable for its owner(s), they would abandon it for something else. But it's not. It's a huge, wealth-making business, often at the expense of decent living conditions for their clients, and most landlords would just as soon limit their clientele to nice, well-heeled white folks. But they buy into areas they themselves declare risky, then whine about the risks and ignore the conditions of their buildings using their terrible renters as excuses for withholding repairs and maintenance that would make the living conditions � and their relationships with renters - better. All the while they rake in the money. Andy Driscoll Saint Paul -------- I (cannot) submit the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men (and women) whatever in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. --- Thomas Jefferson (updated)From: Gary Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2002 21:19:03 -0800 (PST) To: Minneapolis Issues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Mpls] Real and Imagined Risks I would remind Mr. Mork, and the list, rentalproperty owners take risksbeyond what's suggested below. Yes, landlords do cushion themselves with firstand last months rent (or onemonths rent and a deposit). However, a less thanhonorable tenant canquickly do far more damage to a property than this"cushion"- especially ifthey decide "it's not my property, so why should Icare?". I'm not implyingall, or even most, renters would do intentionaldamage. But, guessing amonth's rent to be about $500-600 and a deposit ofperhaps equal, it wouldtake not paying a month's rent and some carpetdamage to level this"cushion". For small property owners, such as anowner-occupied duplex or fourplex,such a hit is a HUGE risk to take. And, if thissmall property owner doesn'thave other resources to repair damage done, it isgoing to be difficult tokeep your property value up, or even be able tocontinue to rent yourproperty. Let's remember, rental property owners serve aneeded function inMinneapolis. They provide a place for people notready, willing, or able tobuy a place. Let's remember this before we startthe subtle name-calling onrental property owners. Gary Bowman Audubon Park_______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more:http://e-democracy.org/mpls __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
_______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
