In a message dated 12/16/2002 7:41:47 AM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, at the DFL endorsing convention, he wasn't able to answer a question about the continuation of TIF. When I was a a candidate for office, I don't think everybody expected me to know the answers to every question -- but I think they also expected me to tell them what I thought about the Profile or what should be cut in the MPS budget. While I think that Samuels would be a great city council member, if I were living in the 3rd I'd be concerned that he doesn't have a deep enough knowledge of some key issues to be effective.
Patrick would you mind clarifying this, because by my recollection he did answer it, and well I might add. It may not have been the answer that you particularly liked, but I think it's a far cry from saying he wasn't able to answer the question, which isn't true.
Jonathan Palmer
Victory
- [Mpls] Don Samuels and the 3rd Ward Patrick Peterson
- Jhpalmerjp
