Dan -

You are right that property taxes hit savings.  That is a downside I hadn't
thought of.  Nevertheless, I think wealth needs to be taxed as well as
income.

Mark Anderson
Bancroft
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Prozinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: [Mpls] Infernal Revenues


> I agree Jim. Another example, two people earn the same over their
> lifetime. One lives high - gambles and travels, one is frugal - buys and
> maintains a home. Why is the second person punished for being thrifty?
>
> Dan Prozinski
> Cedar Riverside
>
>
> From: "Jim Mork"
>
> > Property taxes do hit wealth.  Two problems I see
> > with property taxes.  (1) A hot property market
> > can force your "wealth" to somewhere  you don't
> > want it to go, as in doubling the price of your
> > house when you have no INTENTION to sell it! (2)
> > Though you might in THEORY get "wealthier", the
> > city wants it in cash, and if you can't or won't
> > sell, you might not HAVE any more cash than you
> > had before.  This hurts the elderly who have no
> > more cash flow but who have become wealthier on
> > paper.  This is a major reason people come to
> > resent this "wealth tax".  It is forced on them
> > when they are least able to handle it.
>
> _______________________________________
>
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls



_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to