On 12/28/02 12:49 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In a message dated 12/28/02 10:02:38 AM Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>>  [MS] - I'm sure a lot of struggling families of any race would support this.
>>  Too bad the GOP dropped it to pass the big tax cut for the filthy rich
>>  first, which combined with the big spending increases for homeland security,
>>  
> Dear Mark; I have a small question for you. Is the term "filthy rich" part of
> the Green Party's Doctrine? I was surprised when I heard Ken Pentel use the
> term in an address to the Property Rights Group before his loss in the last
> election. Because of the sweeping negative assumption expressed; it seemed
> demagogic to me. 

Normally I would agree with Keith and apologize for being demagogic, because
he's right and I was.  However, I won't apologize for it because in this
case, given what I am arguing against, I don't feel an apology is necessary
because I've just seen too much greed among the very rich and I cannot
honestly ignore it anymore.  It's just too disgusting.

Does anyone dispute this statement that appeared in a Strib editorial
yesterday: 

"To quote the Minneapolis Fed study, "The households in the top 1 percent of
the wealth distribution own 34.7 percent" of the nation's wealth, "and they
are on average 1,335 times wealth-richer than those in the bottom 40
percent." That bottom 40 percent owns only 1 percent of the nation's wealth;
indeed the bottom 80 percent owns only about half as much wealth as the top
1 percent."

I know I'm not the only one who is bothered by that.

Now please understand that when I talk about the very rich I'm not talking
about someone like a Craig Miller or Keith Reitman (or even a Victoria
Heller as much as I disagree with her at times) who work hard to provide
good living or working spaces for their tenants.  They deserve what they
earn and for all I know aren't particularly rich anyway.  What I'm talking
about are the folks like the Bushes and the Cheneys who made millions as
CEOs and then defrauded their stockholders to make millions more.  And then
they pass tax laws that allow them to keep even more of their ill-gotten
gains.  Or the corporations that register their headquarters outside the US
to avoid paying taxes.  Obviously nobody in the GOP is inclined to do or say
much about this and the one Democrat who might have been was taken from us
two months ago.  

I remember just a few days ago on Christmas being with my family and we were
talking about the Vikings and the stadium sites being discussed in the
northern suburbs.  I'd read that one major reason such sites are appealing
to Red McCombs is that he'd be able to collect the parking revenues that he
cannot get now around the Metrodome or would have been able to get if a
stadium had been built on the U of M campus.  My gramma asked the question
of just how much money does ol' Red need anyway?  Does anyone have the
answer to that because I sure don't.

The greed displayed by the very rich in this country was part of what drew
me to the Greens.  I knew the GOP catered to that audience and it was
becoming increasingly clear (especially at the federal level) that the
Democrats were doing the same.

Although it took me a while to fully grasp some of the Green positions
regarding PACs and the money that floods politics from corporations, I do
truly believe that the only way we're really going to see a change for the
better both locally and nationally is if we leave behind the whole "lesser
of two evils" mess that so many of us are caught up in and deliver a wakeup
call by embracing additional parties.  For me it's the Green Party and
that's a big reason why I've supported Shane Price's campaign.  For others
it might be the Independence Party or some other party.  All I suggest is
that if you're not happy with the way things are going in politics these
days, please open your mind to consider something other than the Big Two.

Mark Snyder
Windom Park

_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to