>From: "steven meldahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Constance Nompelis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "MPLS Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [Mpls] Boarded Houses
>Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:59:33 -0600
>
>The sad thing about the houses torn down was that I had and other rehabbers
>had the money to immediately start any rehab projects as far back as 5 years
>ago. I used to do on average 10 total rehabs a year from 1974 through 1996.
>Most of these were government owned (FHA or VA) or bank repos.
>
>Since 1997, I have been able to find only 3 to do. Unfortunately, the
>previous City Hall people would not let us get are hands on any of the MCDA
>properties. They also took all of the County owned tax forfeiture
>properties that we used to be able to buy at auction. Most ended up being

>torn down - just a total waste!

By rough count, you re-habbed 230 properties between 1974-1996.  How many of those properties did you purchse fromeither the County or MCDA?

>
>Let me give you a quick example. I bought a duplex on the North side for
>$5.000 that needed a code compliance (total rehab and bring up to new
>building code) in 1998. The City said no, they wanted it torn down. At the
>249 hearing, I presented a 9 page detailed bid on the total cost to rehab
>the duplex for $49,000 (I have my own crew). The City rep presented an
>estimate that was written on 2 napkins (I am not kidding) for $140,000 with
>no breakdown at all, just some general estimates. The City committee
>(chaired by Mr. teardown himself - Joe Biernat) voted for demo. Their
>reason was that in their opinion there was no way I could do it that cheap.
>It did not matter that I had done over 250 total rehabs in my career in

>Mpls.

Had you actually purchsed the property, or submited a bid on it?  It seems rather odd to me, as the fair market value (in Jordan on a 1-bedroom duplex (in 1998)) was roughly $175,000.  If you could purchase and rehab it for 1/3 value, what was the city's specific objection?  If it was simply a matter of code compliance and the city decided to tear it down, it was in fact a error of the city's part.  Were there other circumstances?

>
>I decided to fight the City in Court. After over $70,000 in attorney fees
>and an appellate court ruling against me, I decided not to fight any more.
>The City attorney privately agreed to help stop the wholesale destruction of
>perfectly good buildings, and the City's rate of teardowns dropped by over
>80%. So all in all, I had accomplished alot! The new City Council has also
>basically stopped the 249 process (ie teardown) so this stupidity will not
>happen again, at least in the forseeable future.
>

>Steve Meldahl

>Jordan (work)
 
An honest question - where do you live?  The reason I ask - I am a licensed general contractor and the majority of my work is in fact for ward 3 residents (I live there).     


The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*. _______________________________________ Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to