Steve Meldahl wrote:

> While all people including landlords agree that children and adults should
> not have to live in housing that contains excessive levels of lead,
> cockroach dust,  and radon,  I do not see any solutions being offered in
> this new "campaign"  Will there be funding available for property owners
to
> correct the contaminated houses or apartments?

Bringing increased funding to the problem is one of the ultimate goals,
which will benefit property owners.  After all, the lead paint
manufacturers, who caused this environmental problem in the first place,
point their fingers at property owners for failing to keep properties lead
safe.  While advocates for tenants may also point the fingers, we want to
avoid that except in egregious cases (renting to tenants with the knowledge
that hazards exist).  There may be some interesting partnerships with
property owners out of this campaign, partnerships that demand the lead
industry account for its wrongs; i.e., by ponying up the funds to take care
of it.  This benefits us all.

> I have done numerous lead abatements on buildings that I renovate.  Since
I
> have my own crew, I can do a laed abatement for around $3,000 to $4,000 on
> an average 3 bedroom house.  A lead abatement company will charge anywhere
> between $10,000 to $18,000 for the same job.  For newer property owners,
> this could become an excessive burden, especially for newer landlords.

This is one difference that our campaign may make as well.  Currently, if a
child is lead poisoned, the city must respond with work orders for lead
abatement, thus triggering the requirement that the work be done by a
licensed lead abatement contractor (thus, the expense).  If, however, we
document the lead hazards BEFORE a poisoning, the property owner is not
required to use a lead abatement contractor but MUST use lead safe measures.
This may dramatically decrease the costs of remediation.  Further, we are
now sponsoring a FREE workshop for contractors, tentatively set for February
22, to train them on lead safe renovation and rehab.  This is a FREE
seminar, and I encourage property owners and contractors to attend, with
details to follow.

> Another  potential problem could arise.  One can not do a lead abatement
> with people occupying a building.  When a building has been identified
with
> the need for lead abatement, where are the tenants going to go?   If the
> owner can not afford the cost, we might start to see more vacant buildings
> and all of the problems associated with them.  Most of these units would
> fall in the category of being affordable.  Unless there is some sort of
> safety net, the shelters will be filling up soon.

Despite all my stringent disagreements with Mr. Meldahl, this point is
critical.  It is certainly not our intent to create homelessness and in all
our Tenant Remedies Action (TRA) work to date we have not in one case
created homelessness (we cannot be responsible, however, for a tenant's
failure to pay rent or abide by a lease, which may have led to an eviction).
Rather, we have pulled buildings out of iminent condemnation.  There are
numerous creative solutions, both legal and extra-legal, to the problem
identified here, and we will be working with our local lead hazard control
folks in the City to assure that the issue of displacement of tenants does
not occur, except to displace them temporarily so that work can be done.
Minneapolis is actually blessed with a talented and committed team of local
officials who are responsible for lead hazard reduction in the City.

This can be a win-win campaign for property owners and tenants.  In all
candor, however, the property owners who fail to see the big picture and
insist that nothing be done are likely good targets for the campaign as
well.

I encourage anyone interested to call our hotline at (612) 521-LEAD.

Gregory Luce/Project 504 (Minneapolis)
St. Paul residence


_______________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to