Kevin Diaz' article in today's Star Tribune gives the gist of HUD's
backpedaling on moneys already committed to this fiscal year's budget
for MPHA.$1.5 million erased from the current operating subsidy creates
a serious challenge for MPHA management - where to slice when the entire
package is already in execution. Mention was made at the Minneapolis
Highrise Representative Council's board meeting this past Thursday that
security costs are a big-ticket item and that a triage decision at MPHA
would perhaps prefer continuing the roving team of Minneapolis police
officers over full funding of the security guard contract.

This choice can be framed as preferring reactive to proactive management
of security concerns and is analogous to the "one strike and you're out"
profile that Congress has insisted is the rule for removing tenants
accused sometimes anonymously and sometimes for off-site behavior of
acquaintances and/or relatives over which said tenants may well have no
control. 

Removal of federal Project Lookout funding for citizen crime watch
initiatives is a companion piece that HUD Secretary Martinez defends,
averring that eviction is a more suitable tool than the highly
successful resident-driven crime prevention strategy.

To the credit of the Pawlenty Administration, state funding that
replaces this federal subtraction has been left in place for now but the
deep deficit in the next state budget suggests that such continuing
support may be in jeopardy. Municipal financial support related to
preventative security concerns may also be in harm's way as the City of
Minneapolis confronts its own hard fiscal challenges.

If public housing tenants are returned to the tender mercies of persons
who prey on the elderly, sell drugs to the gullible, and tear at the
social fabric of our lives with other violence against persons and
property and the public's defenses are reduced to a roving team of eight
uniformed officers for a population of 5000 tenants in forty-odd
highrises and the overworked capacities of 911 responses, we will
inevitably lose ground in what has been a dramatic turnaround in the
quality of life in our public housing domiciles since the bad old days
of the 1990s and before.

The uniformed guards at our front doors and our volunteer crime
prevention strategies are proven assets that give our residents the same
peace of mind that one expects in any domestic setting. Prevention
works, pure and simple.
In contrast, short-staffed reactive law enforcement misses nuisance
crimes and can lead to the tense and often adversarial relationships
with law enforcement that now prevail in Minneapolis' low-income
neighborhoods. Enforcement is much more expensive than prevention in the
long run.

There are no easy solutions when public money and personnel are drawn
off to pursue hegemonic pretensions elsewhere on the planet and our
municipal leadership refuses to speak out against this wanton abuse of
the national government's capacities. It is also not helpful when the
Minnesota House Republicans contemplate eliminating MFIP and food
assistance for legal immigrants, limiting access to Emergency Assistance
to once in every 18 months (vs. every 12 months), limiting education for
MFIP participants to 12 months (vs. 24 months), reducing eligibility and
increase fees for childcare assistance (cutting 1200 families off
childcare), eliminating state-funded Medical Assistance for legal
immigrants and undocumented pregnant women - all measures that drive
desperation, not allegiance.

"Come," said President Lyndon Johnson, "let us reason together". Reason
indeed, lest baser necessities drive our social contract.

Fred Markus, Horn Terrace, Ward Ten, in the Lyndale Neighborhood  

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003
 

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to