The jurors are taken to eat at the cafeteria right across from where the
exhibit is.  It would be very easy for a jury to see the exhibit.

Anne McCandless
Jordan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jordan S. Kushner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Atherton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Grow on Black History exhibit


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Atherton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:56 PM
> Subject: RE: [Mpls] Grow on Black History exhibit
>
>
> > Jordan Kushner wrote:
> >
> > > I have one question that I cannot resist asking:  How did we get a
> > > narrow-minded jailer in the most powerful political position in
Hennepin
> > > County?
> >
> > I have one question for Mr. Kushner:  If it is indeed true
> > that this exhibit was visible to jurors
>
> JSK - I disagree that the exhibit is in a position to unduly influence
> jurors.   The exhibit is in the tunnel between city hall and the
government
> center.  The juror assembly room is about thirty yards away, on the other
> side of the elevators and escalators.  Jurors can easily come and go
without
> ever seeing the exhibit.  It would take a special effort.  This argument
is
> a red herring - a convenient excuse for Opat to avoid dealing with his
> apparent own discomfort about being confronted with racism.
>
> What is also disturbing is that the exhibit was positioned in the
basement,
> instead of in the atrium on the skyway level where many many more people
> pass through and would notice it.  Whereas a large cross section of the
> public passes through the atrium, it is mostly city and county employees
> that go to the basement of the government center and back and forth
between
> City Hall . There has been an exhibit about baseball history in Minnesota
> located in the atrium for months.  Why wasn't the Black History exhibit
> placed in this spot?  Is not considered important enought to the county
> bureaucrats?  Or are they concerned about the public being "incited" or
> provoked from too much meaningful education?
>
> > and you were a defense
> > attorney or a judge presiding over the criminal prosecution
> > of a White segregationist would think that the oversized
> > version of the photograph might bias jurors?
>
> This is a rather unrealistic hypothetical.  A more likely scenario is that
> jurors hearing a case of a Black criminal defendant (probably a majority
of
> the defendants in Hennepin County) might actually be more sensitive about
> racism   God forbid!
>
> Jordan Kushner
> Golden Valley
>
> >
> > Michael Atherton
> > Prospect Park
> >
> >
>
> Jordan S. Kushner
> > TEMPORARY REMINDER:
> > 1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
> > 2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
> E-Democracy
> > Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls
> >
>
>
>
> TEMPORARY REMINDER:
> 1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
> 2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.
>
> ________________________________
>
> Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn
E-Democracy
> Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to