Will someone with a fine mathematical mind please try to sort out the conflicting statements about the cuts in LGA. The Governor says a city should be able to cut 5% with no sweat and that is all any one city is being asked to do. Others say that the City will take a 30% hit. On what base are these statements talking about - does anyone know?
I would have to agree that a city should be able to trim 5% from its budget, but I'd like to know what the real numbers are.
Jan Del Calzo
Lynnhurst
- RE: [Mpls] LGA Cuts Delcalzojan
- RE: [Mpls] LGA Cuts David Brauer
- [Mpls] Walk a Mile in My Shoes: a city/state challenge Susan Maricle
- [Mpls] LGA Cuts Bensonale
- Re: [Mpls] LGA Cuts Brian Hanninen
