Well Mark, thank you for the apology.  Goes to show why a person should wait
a few minutes before posting a heated reply.  I wasted about two pages of
typing before noticing your second message. I had been out of town for a
week and returned to find several hundred e-mails

My support for the "Affordable Homeownership" initiative is very consistent.
I have harped on it on this list off and on for a year.  I have pushed it in
City, County, and State forums for several years.  I very much remember the
only way I could afford a house.  It was the GI Bill.  After growing up on a
sharecropper farm the first thing owned by my family since before 1931 was
that house.  The very one I live in now.

That duplex gave me the stability to go to college and helped me pay my way
through Graduate School.  When Ronny Raygun left me over-educated and
underemployed in 1981 that duplex kept my family feed and housed for nine
months.  A time when my family could have ended up on welfare and homeless,
if I had been renting.  So perhaps you can see why I have a little passion
about such a program.  I have pushed affordable homeownership and duplexes
for thirty years.

As for impugning the motives of those I disagree with, I completely disagree
with you, (Though I don't question your motives). The people I disagree with
most in the world are many of my best friends; we argue incessantly. (Yes
this includes you brother Paul).  If I ask questions of someone's motives,
it is because there is an obvious logical disconnect when what someone
taking on a particular identity is expected to do, and then does something
so contrary as to completely invalidate that identity.  People who wear
their social sensitivity on their chest like a badge of honor and yet are
against programs to allow the poor and minorities, (very often the same), to
have an opportunity to own their own home are to be questioned.  Especially
when owning such a house can be done for about the same amount as rent, (or
even possibly less).  It has nothing to do with disagreeing with me, heck
almost anyone who knows me will tell you I enjoy that.  It has to do with
speaking with two tongues. Middle Class Whites advocating for poor people to
live in rental apartments, that have been exorbitantly subsidized, instead
of in their own homes reminds me of the Reservation Agents.  Those good
Christian white folks who looked after the interest of poor Native Americans
until they had stolen all their possessions considered worth "helping" them
out of.

To paraphrase that great philosopher Heinlen, "If you hear the sound of hoof
beats expect horses instead of zebras".  I expect to see a person
representing themselves as doing business as an affordable housing advocate
to actually advocate for affordable housing. When someone heads an
organization that has "For Neighborhoods" in its name I expect them to
support neighborhood initiatives and neighborhood organizations.  If I see
the Affordable Housing advocate fighting against poor people being empowered
to buy a home, or if I see a purported "Neighborhood" empowerment
organization fighting neighborhoods at every turn, I begin to question the
hoof beats and perhaps start to expect zebras.  This is not impugning the
horsiness of the Zebras; it is just that some things start to have different
stripes.  So this is not impugning anything, it is however calling a zebra a
zebra when they trot them out.

I may be just an old country boy, but don't tell me it is a saddle-bred when
you are trotting out a mule. If you get my drift?

So Mark and others, please do look thoroughly at the affordable home
ownership option, and give input about how to make it better.  Check its
teeth, lift its tail, look at its stride and gait, and I think you will find
a thoroughbred instead of the donkey some non-profits are turning out to be.

Jim Graham,
Ventura Village

>Trends, like horses, are easier to ride in the direction they are going.
- Anonymous

>"We can only be what we give ourselves the power to be" - A Cherokee Feast
of Days


TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to