Today's Strib reports on a guilty verdict for a man who kidnapped, and raped, 
a woman DT. The report continues to describe the man grabbing the woman, 
around the throat, and forcing her to a "secluded area behind a church" where 
he raped her and kept her till morning. He reportedly told her "she was going 
to keep him warm throughout the night."

With all the chatter about legalizing "urban camping", I have to wonder if 
this might have been a laissez-faire campground, possibly on church property? 
Is it possible this was an ongoing condition? If proper, responsible, parties 
blind-eyed this situation in the name of 'do-goodin' , would it be reasonable 
to assign blame to those negligent?

So called urban camping ain't a Boyscout camp, or church retreat (although 
those are perhaps another issue). Most often they are ongoing home to 
inebriates, scofflaws, and other unseemly characters, 

They are symptoms of a problem/problems, of course. Legalization of a 
dangerous condition is not the solution, and creates other problems.

Do not legalize, and institutionalize, sleeping in the streets, and gangways 
of our city. Besides...our city budget cannot afford another department, to 
regulate hobo jungles after dark.-

Keith Reitman  NearNorth

TEMPORARY REMINDER:
1. Send all posts in plain-text format.
2. Cut as much of the post you're responding to as possible.

________________________________

Minneapolis Issues Forum - A City-focused Civic Discussion - Mn E-Democracy
Post messages to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, and more: http://e-democracy.org/mpls

Reply via email to